Answer:
Kelly Pitney
Explanation: Amount in $
May 3. Cash Dr.4,500
Unearned Revenue Cr.4,500
May 5. Cash Dr.2,450
Advance fee Cr.2,450
May 9.
Advertisement Expense Dr. 225
Cash Cr.225
May 13. Stationary Dr. 640
Cash Cr.640
May 15. Account Receivable Dr. 9,180
Service Revenue Cr. 9,180
May 16. Salaries Expense Dr.750
Cash Cr.750
May 17. Cash Dr.8,360
Service Revenue Cr.8,360
May 20. Supplies Dr.735
Supplies Payable Cr.735
May 21. Account Receivable Dr.4,820
Service Revenue Cr.4,820
May 25. Cash Dr.7,900
Service Revenue Cr.7,900
May 27. Cash Dr.9,520
Account Receivable Cr.9,520
May 28. Salaries Expense Dr.750
Cash Cr.750
May 30-31. Utility bill-Telephone Dr.260
Utility bill- Electricity Dr.810
Cash Cr.1,070
May 31. Cash Dr.3,300
Service Revenue Cr.3,300
May 31. Account Receivable Dr.2,650
Service Revenue Cr.2,650
May 31. Drawings Dr.10,500
Cash Cr.10,500
b. Trail Balance
Kelly Pitney
For the moth of May
Amount in $
Dr. Cr.
Cash 22,095
Unearned Revenue 6,950
Advertisement Expense 225
Stationary Expense 640
Account Receivable 7,130
Service Revenue 36,210
Salaries Expense 1,500
Supplies Payable 735
Supplies Expense 735
Electricity Expense 810
Telephone Expense 260
Drawings 10,500
Total 43,895 43,895
Answer:
I used an excel spreadsheet to calculate this:
the least squares regression line:
y = a + bx
y = $2,752 + 3.87x
where y = total cash wash costs and x = rental returns
fixed costs = $2,752 per month
variable cost = $3.87 per car washed
Answer: The firm issued common stock in 2013.
Explanation:
Since the firm has never paid a dividend to its common stockholders, we can see that the firm issued common stock in 2013.
Looking clearly at the common equity section, we can see that there was an increase in the common stock from $1000 to $2000.
The reduction in the retained earnings from $2340 to $2000 also shows that there was a loss.
Based on the above scenarios, we can say that the firm issued common stock in 2013.
If his employer is a state or local government. In this circumstance,
Bernie can case an action in contrast to his employer under the Fourth
Amendment if his employer is a state or local government. Normally, employment
actions by private employers do not activate legal protections because the
Constitution is intended to control government extremes. The term used is State
action, which comprises arrangements by both state and federal governments. If
no State action is involved, no constitutional protections are activated.
