Answer:
yes it is the government can write a letter to the editor
Explanation:
this is because there is a law that says that if someone online says something about the presedit the presidit can not do anything because i belive it is the right to speech or say something you do not like about him or her
This is how they differ:
Explanation:
The plat method legal description is commonly used in the survey systems in government. It is kept in record in the county where the property is located. It refers to place the property is located in plat map thereby describing a specific parcel of the real property. It consists of
• Subdivision name
• Lot number
• Block number
• Plat book official number
• Page number in plat book
• County and state where plat was recorded
The plat method legal description is used for industrial parks, and single family homes inside a subdivisions.
Answer: B
Explanation: Appellate courts focus on questions of law, NOT on questions of facts like the trial courts. The appellate judges want to know whether the law was applied accurately. The appellate court overrules a trial court decision only if a very important legal error was made in the trial court.
Answer:
The red car appears to be "tailgating" the red SUV ... following too close behind it.
The driver of the red car should immediately back off ... leave some more space between his car and the SUV.
If the SUV isn't driving fast enough for him, he should fall in behind the blue car (at a safe distance), and perhaps into one of the two right-hand lanes, and WAIT for a safe opportunity to pass all the traffic and move out ahead. The traffic pattern is sure to change in a minute or two.
Explanation:
The most likely answer is that the victims should not be able to sue the manufacturer of a violent game for a design effect. This is because it is difficult to establish a direct connection between the video game and the mass shooting. It is likely that thousands, or even millions of other people have played the game constantly and have not developed these tendencies. Moreover, even if the tendencies were developed, this would not mean that the thoughts would develop into action. Thefore, it is unlikely that the manufacturer would be considered liable.
