Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
An implied power can be described as those powers which does not exist in the Constitution of the United States but expressly stated due to similar powers enjoyed by the Congress.
When the framers of the Constitution were drafting the document they had in mind that the needs of people will grow with the growing nation, so in Article I they gave the Congress right to excercise the power under the 'Necessary and Proper Clause.'
So, an example of implied power from the given options would be D. Congress have right to use implied power to close post offices in rural areas on Saturdays. Therefore, option D is correct.
Answer:
At least 30 years old to run for governor.
At least 35 years old to run for presidential candidate.
State resident for at least 10 years to run for governor in Missouri and Oklahoma.
Presidential Candidate must have been a permanent resident of the US for 14 consecutive years.
Governor can serve 4-year terms for total of 2 terms
President can serve 4-year terms for total of 2 terms
I’m done idk
Explanation:
Answer:
2 is false.
Explanation:
The supreme court does act as the last court of appeals (with cases regarding constitutional law and federal law), after local and state courts. It also hears cases that involve the US Constitution. Small Claim Courts settle local cases involving small amounts of money, not the Supreme Court. Therefore, 2 is false.
Answer:
Ora
Explanation:
Alguien los vio haciendolo?
alomejor no tienen pruebas
como lo van a denuciar si no tienen pruebas q deverdad paso
