What Martin's questions reveal about her point of view toward Bates' work is that:
- Some inmates were able to relate to some of Shakespeare's works than many scholars because such inmates had such similar experiences.
This question is related to "Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison"
<h3>About "Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison"</h3>
"Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison" is an article that was written by Mitchel Martin who interviewed Laura Bates.
Laura Bates is known to be author of “Shakespeare Saved My Life: Ten Years of Solitary with the Bard." In the story, she shared how she successfully taught Shakespeare works to inmates in a maximum security prison.
With her interaction with Martin, we discover that Bates' work reveal that the prisoners could relate to some of the events that transpired in some of Shakespeare's plays because they've had similar experiences before.
Learn more about Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison on brainly.com/question/11944939
<span>A. Make arguments that are easy to refute
It's important to understand the opposite side to your argument, but your counterclaim should be easily refuted by the rest of your argument, typically within the same paragraph. This shows that you've done your research on both sides, but still your side is much more strongly supported.</span>
Answer:
ok I'll surely help you. but don't rely on me so much I'm in middle school and I don't do physics and biology or chemistry maybe I can do maths or English Or health questions have a good day.
Explanation:
I'll help you as a friend.
Answer:
I believe school should not have clothing restrictions and let me tell you why .
I believe schools should not have rules of conduct regarding with clothing restrictions because one of many reasons .Firstly , numerous of kids in todayś society express their selves in clothing wear . The clothing can either vary from crop tops to easily being flip flops . However, we do have antagonists against this debation . Some people believe that clothing can be too revealing too others possibly even cause hazards as well . This debation puts a great argument in place .
Clothing wear is a expressive outlet too society today because it gives a chance for kids to be their selves . it is a fact that students who are against school uniforms argue that they lose their self-identity when they lose their right to express themselves through fashion. This proclaims the fact that kids can lose the ideal of expression because the school districts takes that away .
The other side of the argument believes that clothing can be hazardous or too revealing too others . In fact 1/3 school injuries have been caused by shoes not being sturdy enough . For example flip flops , and heels . This side does provide a good argument . However whoś side are you on ? who do you believe has a stronger argument.
This is all up for a debation , The argument still stands strong today. Do you believe that clothing restrictions should be lifted ? Or do you believe that they should be in use for protection of others ? You decide .
Explanation:
I hope I helped . I wrote this out of my own type . No plagrisim involved . I did it all on my own . You have a nice night or day . Xoxox.
