Answer:
It is known as acceptance sampling.
Explanation:
Acceptance sampling is a statistical process used in companies to measure the quality of products without having to review the entire batch of products.
When an acceptance test is performed, the sample is chosen at random, and its quantity is considered depending on the size of the product lot.
Through acceptance sampling, the product is rejected or accepted, since the quality of the product can be qualified with the sample.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Friederick Herzberg constructed the Two-Factory Theory in 1959 which focuses on the theory of self-motivation and the implementation of self-directed work teams. Nowadays more and more organizations are reverting to self-managed work teams as there are many pros involved. Unfortunately, some of the cons experienced include: more meetings need to be held to make sure that everyone is on board, or projects take longer to finish because of the decision-making process lagging. The biggest problem would be that because there exists no structure within the team, chaos might erupt and productivity would decrease.
I believe the answer is: <span>increased job creation and more consumer spending
The increased job creation come from the increasing amount of players that the team need that the increasing amount of administrative workers to manage the team.
The increased consumer spending come from the additional purchase of the tickets, merchandises, along with foods/beverages during the match.</span>
Answer:
The temporal lobe.
Explanation:
The temporal lobe is the part of the brain where the processing of auditory information, sound, takes place. Since the information you receive when the instructor is making the announcement is audio, in his speech, it is processed in the temporal lobe. It is also where the primary auditory cortex is located which is responsible for converting auditory information into words and sentences to make it understandable.
Answer and Explanation:
The Constitution itself establishes a representative democracy, or republic, not a pure democracy. In that sense, I guess you could say it's "undemocratic," although that word seems to have connotations about the electoral process that aren't exactly accurate.
The framers of the Constitution were very concerned about a majority rule changing fundamental laws. While they made the Constitution a flexible document that provided for the possibility of amending, it is an extremely laborious task to do so. The idea is that no temporary majority can significantly affect the rights and protections of the citizenry.
To a large extent, that changed with one critical writing. In 1905, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. wrote the dissent in Lochner v. New York which established the concept of an "empty Constitution." That means that the prevailing legal theory to this day is that the Constitution does not in fact establish *anything* and in lieu of judicial precedent, the will of the people at any snapshot in time is effectively law. This is typically a leftist judicial outlook.
One of the biggest ironies of this decision is making it's way through the appellate courts right now: the California Prop 8 issue. Of course the leftists (rightfully) side with those who support gay marriage. However, if the case is to be decided in their favor, i.e. that a majority cannot vote away someone's right, it will be a repudiation of Holmesian doctrine. If the courts uphold the Holmesian standard, they will be forced to rule that the popular vote can, in fact, restrict rights of the people--in this case, the first amendment right of freedom of association.
