It is essential that the whole response<span> is read and then allocated to the level ... In </span>your<span> answer </span>you should refer<span> to the main religious tradition of Great ... </span>teach<span> artificial contraception within marriage is wrong- </span>against<span> natural law and .... should </span>reach<span> a </span>justified conclusion<span>. .... Divorce is </span>against<span> the principles of the Sikh </span>religion<span>.</span>
The detail highlighted in the photograph for the understanding of the reader is Parthenon, high on a hill, catches the first light of morning. Thus, option C is the correct answer.
<h3>What is Parthenon?</h3>
The powerful Greek City-State of Athens, which served as the leadership of the Delian League, placed the Parthenon at the centre of its religious life. It was a representation of the wealth, power, and advanced civilization of Athens.
In this excerpt, the highlight was The Parthenon, which provides information to the reader and understanding of the subject.
Therefore, option C Parthenon, high on a hill, catches the first light of morning is the correct answer.
Learn more about Parthenon, here:
brainly.com/question/10363096
#SPJ1
Answer:
This is an example of marginal analysis, as the decisions made by Raphael are on margin.
Explanation:
The decision of Raphael about pool versus bike time is totally a "how-much decision". It is clear that pool time and bike time can both reduce the time for race. However, the efficiency of pool time is high currently, and hence there is much sense in trying to spend more time in the pool and less on bike. This however makes no sense that all the time is spent in the pool and no time biking. Raphael only intends to alter the number of hours spend on each activity at the margin.
Answer:
C) retroactive interference
Explanation:
Retroactive interference occurs when one forget the previously task which was learnt very recent due to learning of the task.
The later learning interferes of the individual with the earlier learning. The new memories disrupt the old memories.
<u>In the given case study, Jessica being confused is an example of retroactive interference.</u>
I do not believe that this factor is a factor that needs a grant. it is a small factor of maturity, and a momentary factor, there is not a great disparity which is justifiable to have a scholarship for that, in my view it is a minimal difference that is soon matched.
