Answer:
We can infer that Zlateh was still a productive animal, capable of promoting Aaron's survival.
Explanation:
When reading the short story we can see that Zlateh was a very dear goat for the family that raised her, but due to Zlateh's financial difficulties and aging, the family decided to sell it to a butcher, because she believed she was no longer more as productive as before. Aaron, was the boy responsible for taking Zlateh to the city to be sold, but due to environmental conditions Aaron and Zlateh are trapped in a haystack.
Although Aaron had no food to survive while he was still worth it Zlateh ate the hay to produce milk and keep the boy alive, proving that he was still productive and useful to the family.
Answer:
They are true and unbiased.
Explanation:
Accurate facts are unbiased. They do not "pick sides" when it comes to a topic. Facts also must be true. It can't be telling false information or stretching the truth; stretching the truth is not being completely honest.
"Dogs are canines." is a fact.
"Dogs are the worst." is NOT a fact. It is an opinion.
Answer:
In "The Lottery," one of the main ideas presented is the fact that all humans are ultimately on their own, and are responsible only for themselves. The story shows how solidarity is inexistent in this town, as no one is willing to defend those who are chosen in the lottery. This is likely a critique of the period of the two World Wars. During this time period, individualism became more prominent, and solidarity became less common.
The story is also a critique of mob mentality and the value of tradition. Despite the fact that the lottery is an outdated, damaging tradition, people feel forced to carry it out due to social expectations. Social pressure had also been prominent in past years, particularly during the Holocaust, where many common people committed horrible acts of cruelty due to tradition and social expectations.
Explanation:
<span>It could be said that the detail at the beginning of the Pardoner´s tale have a “hooked” because <span>The gory details would have been interesting and may have caused his audience to listen. He gives the audience a vivid description of his acts. </span></span>
<span>The stanza is an example of extended metaphor. It is interesting that the lines are unchanged from the original song from which the melody for “Birmingham Sunday” is taken. In this metaphor, the “men in the forest” seemed awfully concerned about the “black berries.” At the same time, the speaker, “with a tear” in his or her eye, asks about the “dark ships.” Although this stanza can be taken many different ways, I think it is a metaphor for the fear that people feel for things they do not understand. The men in the forest are scared of things they don’t know from the Blue Sea, while the speaker (who seems to be from the Blue Sea based on the question posed) is fearful of the dark ships in the forest. In this way, the extended metaphor is speaking about the fear that races have of each other and the meaninglessness of that fear. Just as the “black berries” or “dark ships” mean nothing to us, race shouldn’t mean anything when evaluating the worth of a person.</span>
