Charles Boardman Hawes (1889-1923) was an American author of both fiction and nonfiction stories of the sea, well known for three historical novels.
<u><em>Answer:</em></u>
- They have to destroy the colonized people's culture, including their literature and language.
<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>
Ngugi wa Thiong'o says the genuine point of imperialism was to control individuals' riches; what they delivered, how they created it, how it was dispersed, the control through culture, how individuals thought of themselves, and their relationship to the world.
Answer:
Responsibility. I loved taking on challenges, leading, and helping others. To me, being a prefect was a joy. I chose to go to the hardest dorm to prefect (the younger kids’ dorms) for my prefecting years. These kids often struggled with simple things like laundry and keeping to a good study/play schedule as well as were constantly home sick. I loved helping them establish a strong base to progress through high school with and making them feel welcome.
Working with School Leadership. As a young adult, I relished the opportunity to work with the adults in charge of my school. As a prefect, I had lots of time to talk to, spend time with , and learn from them. It is also a great way to get letters of reference from teachers…
Self-improvement. By volunteering myself as a figurehead for younger kids, I force myself to improve every day for them. I have to learn how to reinforce positive habits and weed out negative ones. I needed to learn to work with people with drastically different goals and perspectives.
Explanation:
In essence, leadership, responsibility, and self improvement.
<span>Bear-proof trash cans have been shown to be effective in other towns in this state. This reasoning is VALID because it provides evidence that bear-proof trashcans are effective.
If we want to show that we keep up with the latest methods, we need to require bear-proof trash cans. This reasoning is INVALID because it does not prove these types of cans would do anything to prevent bears from getting in them. This argument has more to do with "showing" people the town can "keep up."
If we can spend money on schools and the fire department, we can also spend it on bear-proofing. This reasoning is INVALID because, in order to spend money on something, it must be proven effective. This argument does not prove that bear-proof cans are effective; it merely says money should be spent on them because money is also spent on other things.
Last year, a tourist in town was mauled by a bear on trash day. This reasoning is VALID because there appears to be a connection between the tourist's d</span>eath and the trashcans. In this case, the bear would have known that trash day = food day, and so the bear was invading human space that day and came into contact with a tourist. With bear-proof cans, bears would no longer associate trash with food, and so these types of incidents could be prevented.
I need to see the short story and the options please
