Answer:
Let's begin by writing the mathematical equations given by the sentences.
Let X = smaller number
Let Y = larger number
The first sentence tells us
X + Y = 38
The second sentence tells us
X = Y/3 + 6
Since you weren't given a specific method to use, you can use either the substitution method or the elimination(addition) method, whichever works best for you.
Since the 2nd equation has the X isolated, I'm going to isolate the X in the first equation,
X = 38 - Y
Since both equations are equal to X, I can set them equal to one another and solve for Y.
Y/3 + 6 = 38 - Y
Y + 18 = 114 - 3Y
4Y = 96
Y = 24
Then use either of the two original equations to solve for X
X + Y = 38
X + 24 = 38
X = 14
Step-by-step explanation:
PLS MAKE ME AS BRAINLIST
Answer:
12
Step-by-step explanation:
Well, 12/12=1, which I guess is the smallest number we can get, and 12 is divisible by 2 too.
Answer:
the original price is 75.50
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
$26532.98
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Given:</u>
- Principal = $10000
- Profit rate = 5% PA compounded
- Time = 20 years
- Compounds = 20*1 = 20
<u>Sum is:</u>
- 10000*(1 + 5/100)²⁰ ≈ 26532.98
Answer: option d. the argument is valid by the law of detachment.
The law of detachment consists in make a conlcusion in this way:
Premise 1) a => b
Premise 2) a is true
Conclusion: Then, b is true
Note: the order of the premises 1 and 2 does not modifiy the argument.
IN this case:
Premise 1) angle > 90 => obtuse
Premise 2) angle = 102 [i.e. it is true that angle > 90]]
Conclusion: it is true that angle is obtuse
