Answer:
<u>Social</u> neuroscience seeks to identify the neural basis of social behavior and looks at how we can illuminate our understanding of groups, interpersonal relations, and emotions by understanding their cognitive underpinnings.
Explanation:
Social neuroscience can be defined as the interdisciplinary study of multilevel neurobiological processes (nervous, endocrine, immune) that allow us to interact with the social world, of how neurobiological events affect psychosocial processes and how these, in turn, have effects at the biological level, that is, it addresses fundamental questions about the mind and its dynamic interactions with the biological systems of the brain and the social world in which it resides. This field studies the relationship between neural and social processes, including the intermediate components of information processing and operations at the levels of neural and computational analysis.
The correct option is A.
Meurer et al., 2002 divided domestic violence into nine stages, with each of the stages having its own characteristic features. The author wrote that the stage four of the nine divisions is characterized by initiation of excessive control by means of physical and emotional abuse. Domestic violence has been defined as a type of coercive behavior that is targeted at gaining control over a particular related person by using intimidation, threat or harmful weapons. <span />
Answer:
1. The fact that a times most people tends to be obviously unethical without any reasonable explanations to back up their inactivity.
2. I did not agree with the idea of generality in the question which obviously points out that everybody is unethical to some extent which might be false because even at the course of generality, there most be an exception.
Explanation:
To be unethical means to be unable to conform to the given standards or rules of an organization professionally.
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
Answer:
Hunting, growing food, taking care of animals, supply gathering.
Explanation:
without the help of each other, they wouldn't be able to do all of that stuff prepared for the seasons.
