That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
The economic consequence which doesn't relate to obesity in this case would be D - the cost of services for chemotherapy. The amount of money that chemotherapy costs is largely unrelated to obesity levels either of the one who's giving it or the one who's receiving it.
Answer:oppose joining another army i europe
Explanation: