The correct answer to this open question is the following.
This would be my letter to the author of "Brother in the Land," discussing the positive and negative aspects of the play script.
Dear Mr. Swindells,
I have just read your interesting book "Brother in the Land."
As an avid reader of your work, I would like to share the following comments about your futuristic novel.
First, the positives.
It really caught my attention for the futuristic scenarios described in the story.
The location of the novel, norther England after the nuclear explosion was a good place to develop the story.
Danny, the teenage boy and the main character of the story, is well portrayed.
The Negatives.
The story is not so original. There have been other authors that have written about future catastrophic scenarios due to a nuclear war.
The terror described in the story could be more realistic about what could have happened in a real situation. I think sometimes some exaggerations do not pay the story a good service.
Thank you very much for your work that I respect it so much.
Sincerely,
B, D, E
Took the test on EDG 2020
Answer:
Kaveh Akbar: How I Found Poetry in Childhood Prayer
In the Presence of the Long Faultless Tongue of God
Explanation:
I believe this is a story.
The correct answer is Maddened—he wanted a divorce, and she would not agree to it.
He lied and even left her for a year, hoping that she would divorce him, but since she didn't want to be the "wife that got divorced" she stayed with him, even after he said that he was kidnapped by pirates which was a blatant lie.
