First off, the controversy of this had led to an imbalance in congress among the number of free states and slave states. So this rules out our first option. Due to it not being all of the above, that's our fourth answer ruled out as well. The Webster speech did not happen for 10 more years so it is very unlikely that this is what led to that speech. Even without the process of elimination, it would be B because the Missouri Compromise admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state in order to preserve the balance of power in congress. Also, Henry Clay (the Great Compromiser) drafted this.
The answer to this question is: <span>Even the king must respect certain rights of the people.
Before the creation of Magna Charta, the power of a king in England is unlimited. During this period, the King was able to punish whoever he feel pleased even without proof of wrongdoings.
The creation of Magna Charta make the King exposed to the risk of law which makes him more accountable when he's doing something that violates human rights</span>
Answer:pretty sure it's d
Explanation:a is unreasonable because they're too old, b isn't it because they're too old, and c i don't think it's EXACTLY like the one described. good luck!
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "FALSE." <span>Japan's involvement in China was the cause of the fall of the Tang Dynasty. This statement is not true. There were four reasons why the Tang Dynasty declined and Japan is not one of the reasons.</span>
1) All citizens had the right to equal treatment under law.
2) A person was considered innocent until proven guilty.
3) The burden of proof rested with the accuser rather than the accused.
4) Any law that seemed unreasonable or grossly unfair could be set aside.
