1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Phantasy [73]
2 years ago
7

How were Southern farms different from Southern plantations?​

History
2 answers:
andreyandreev [35.5K]2 years ago
6 0

Answer: They were different because a plantation was bigger than a farm. Another reason is that thier was more equipment and there were more buldings on a plantation. Farms were owned by middle-class people and plantations were owned by the more wealthy.

Feliz [49]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The crops. Farms produced food. Plantations grew raw material for Industry, like Cotton, Tobacco, Indigo and Sugar for Rum. The Deep South Plantations were net Importers of food.

Explanation:

Because they are two totally different thing and need different things.

You might be interested in
What was a major difference between social reformers and socialists in the
RoseWind [281]

Answer:

The history of socialism has its origins in the 1789 French Revolution and the changes which it brought, although it has precedents in earlier movements and ideas. The Communist Manifesto was written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in 1848 just before the Revolutions of 1848 swept Europe, expressing what they termed scientific socialism. In the last third of the 19th century, social democratic parties arose in Europe, drawing mainly from Marxism. The Australian Labor Party was the world's first elected socialist party when it formed government in the Colony of Queensland for a week in 1899.[1]

In the first half of the 20th century, the Soviet Union and the communist parties of the Third International around the world mainly came to represent socialism in terms of the Soviet model of economic development and the creation of centrally planned economies directed by a state that owns all the means of production, although other trends condemned what they saw as the lack of democracy. In the United Kingdom, Herbert Morrison said that "socialism is what the Labour government does" whereas Aneurin Bevan argued that socialism requires that the "main streams of economic activity are brought under public direction", with an economic plan and workers' democracy.[2] Some argued that capitalism had been abolished.[3] Socialist governments established the mixed economy with partial nationalisations and social welfare.

By 1968, the prolonged Vietnam War (1959–1975) gave rise to the New Left, socialists who tended to be critical of the Soviet Union and social democracy. Anarcho-syndicalists and some elements of the New Left and others favoured decentralised collective ownership in the form of cooperatives or workers' councils. Socialists have also adopted the causes of other social movements such as environmentalism, feminism and progressivism.[4] At the turn of the 21st century in Latin America, Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez championed what he termed socialism of the 21st century, which included a policy of nationalisation of national assets such as oil, anti-imperialism and termed himself a Trotskyist supporting permanent revolution.[5]

3 0
3 years ago
What is the answer in History
stich3 [128]

Answer:

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!! :)

6 0
2 years ago
When did someone say that something was your fault when it really wasn’t? What did you do?
nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

i punch them in the mouth till a tooth came out

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the effects of the Tet Offensive at home and in Vietnam?
MArishka [77]

Answer:

B, D, E

For EDGI

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Principle stating that a person cannot be held in prison without being charged with a crime
Zanzabum
The principle that a person cannot be held in prison without being charged with a crime is known as <em>habeas corpus</em>. This principle protects an individuals right to trial and due process if they are accused of committing a crime. 
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which amendments extended individual rights? To whom were rights extended?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the state of the many, diverse, religions in India under British rule?
    9·1 answer
  • how the top third of Africa came to be dominated by peoples who speak Afroasiatic languages. This would include an explanation o
    6·1 answer
  • How did the civil war show the flaws in the US constitution?
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement describes a controversial step taken by President Wilson's Attorney General Mitchell Palmer in 1920?
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement is the most accurate concerning life of a slave? They were part owners and received a percent of the profit from
    8·2 answers
  • All of the following are accurate statements about the Great Lakes and the Mississippi River system except
    10·2 answers
  • 2. Which two organizations were formed
    12·2 answers
  • What is true about globalization as a foreign policy concern?
    5·2 answers
  • Mr. Blue lives in the Blue house. Mrs. Yellow
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!