All categories

3 years ago

Choose all that apply.

Business

2 answers:

Scilla [17]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

• Tracking your spending.

• Avoiding impulse purchases.

• Using credit cards infrequently.

• Looking for bargains.

Dima020 [189]3 years ago

4 0

1.tracking your spending 2.avoiding impulse purchases 3.using credit cards infrequently

You might be interested in

Roman buys seed packets for the school garden. One packet of radish seeds costs $1. 75. One packet of tomato seeds costs $2. 50.

bezimeni [28]

Roman may buy 23 tomato and 9 radish, for the school garden.

<h3><u>Calculation:</u></h3>

Let (r) represent the cost of one packet of radish seeds, and

Let (t) represent the cost of one packet of tomato seeds.

Amount spent by roman = $62.75

It denotes that;

$\ 1.75r +2.5t = 62.75.......equn. 1$

Roman bought 32 packets of seeds and one packet of radish seeds costs = $ 1.75.

One packet of tomato seeds costs = $ 2.50.

It denotes that,

$\ r+t=32.....equn.2$

Substitute t=9 , and r= 23, we have

In eq. 1

$\ = 1.75\times9 + 2.5\times23 = 62.75\\ = 15.75+57.5 \neq 62.75 \\ = 62.75 = 62.75$

In eq.2

$\ =32=23+9 = 32\\$

Here, both the equations are satisfied, therefore, option [C] is correct.

Learn more about equation:

brainly.com/question/2263981

8 0

2 years ago

Sierra offers to sell Alyssa a Scottish terrier puppy for $800. Alyssa and Sierra do not discuss the dog’s ancestry, but Alyssa

lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer:

Probably not, because Alyssa made a mistake about the dog's value, not a mistake about material fact.

Explanation:

When Sierra offered to sell the dog to Allysa, Allysa failed to discuss the ancestry of the puppy. She wrongly believed the dog came from a line of champions.

On finding out the dog is only worth $200, she will not be able to rescind the contract because the onus to ask all relevant questions about the purchase before accepting is on her.

She made the mistake of assuming the dog was worth $800. She made a mistake about the dog's value and not the material fact.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

question 14(multiple choice worth 5 points) (04.02 mc) who was intended to benefit from the land act of 1800? a large-scale farm

oksano4ka [1.4K]

Since the government aimed to make westward migration more appealing to immigrants, "A poor family that coveted property" was primarily those who benefited.

Due to their inability to purchase a farm at an affordable price, many ended up squatting on public property without a valid title. The Harrison's Land Act of 1800 decreased the minimum purchase size from 640 acres to 320 acres and added a credit provision. A quarter of the total cost had to be paid up front, and the remaining amount had to be paid over the course of four years with an extra year added on for late payments.

To learn more about Land Act of 1800 here

brainly.com/question/697970

#SPJ4

5 0

7 months ago

Tom takes a loan of $60,000 at 4% annual interest to purchase a property worth $100,000. He earns an annual income of $10,000 af

guajiro [1.7K]

Based on the given data, Tom's leveraged return on the real estate investment is 13.3%.

A leveraged return means an investment return on equity partially financed with debt.

Investment in property = $100,000 - $60,000

Investment in property = $40,000

Interest = $60,000 * 4%

Interest = $2,400

Net income after tax = ($10,000 - $2,400) * (1 - 30%)

Net income after tax = $7,600 * 0.70

Net income after tax = $5,320

Leveraged return = Net income after tax / Investment in property * 100

Leveraged return = $5,320 / $40,000 * 100

Leveraged return = 0.133 * 100

Leveraged return = 13.3%

Hence, Tom's leveraged return on the real estate investment is 13.3%.

Learn more about leveraged return:

<em>brainly.com/question/14005616</em>

8 0

2 years ago

hello are anyone there with free time on there hands i need friends and dont go if i dont answer because my mom is well a mom an

Troyanec [42]

Answer:

ello

Explanation:

I'll be your fren if that's what cha asking :^

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers