Answer: $5 billion
Explanation:
First find the spending multiplier which is a multiplier that shows how Aggregate demand increases as a result of additional spending.
Multiplier = 1 / (1 - Marginal propensity to consume)
= 1 / ( 1 - 0.8)
= 5
If the government wants to raise Aggregate demand by $25 billion, they should spend:
Increase in AD = Amount * Multiplier
25 billion = Amount * 5
Amount = 25 / 5
= $5 billion
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": The employee whose performance was appraised may develop a deflated ego.
Explanation:
Appraisal interviews are conducted to discuss the performance of employees. The company sets a standard of how the duties of workers must be developed and employees are evaluated based on those guidelines. The closer the employee method or woking is to the company's standards, the possibilities of scoring higher increase.
However, not all employees end up with a good score after appraisals. <em>Those who are provided with negative notes typically develop a deflated ego since their performance was qualified as lacking. Managers must follow up on these workers to make sure they are not discouraged and that they accomplish the objectives their roles demand.</em>
Answer and Explanation:
There is no contract between Time's and Joshua, because it is not legally binding to each other and it has not been signed by either party. So not a single party is liable for the contract as the contract is unsigned and non-liable
Time has used it as a promotional means only for promoting magazine subscriptions.
Therefore, a case can not be built on letter-based basis.
Answer:
Monthly payment: 460.41 dollars
Effective rate: 4.07%
Explanation:
we will calculate the PTM of an annuity of 25,000 over 5 year at 4%
PV $25,000.00
time 60
rate 0.003333333
C $ 460.413
Now we need to know the effective rate, which is the same as 4% compounding monthly:
![(1+0.04/12)^{60} = (1+ r_e)^{5}\\r_e = \sqrt[5]{(1+0.04/12)^{60}} - 1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%281%2B0.04%2F12%29%5E%7B60%7D%20%3D%20%281%2B%20r_e%29%5E%7B5%7D%5C%5Cr_e%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%5B5%5D%7B%281%2B0.04%2F12%29%5E%7B60%7D%7D%20-%201)
effective rate = 0.040741543 = 4.07%
Answer: No. It does not violate Title VII if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Cynthia, requested a two-week leave from her employer to go on a religious pilgrimage and that the pilgrimage was not a requirement of her religion, but Cynthia felt it was a calling from God.
Based on the scenario, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave. According to the court, when an employee says that based on his or her religious belief, he or she is required to go to a pilgrimage, the person has to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
In this case, her church which is the Roman Catholic didn't call for a pilgrimage as it was her personal choice. Therefore, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.
