Answer:
Both interest accrual and interest capitalism
Explanation:
The total loan balance increases due to "Both interest accrual and interest capitalism"
This is because INTEREST ACCRUAL on a loan is capitalized, which implies that it will be added to the principal balance, therefore increasing the total loan balance.
Similarly, the INTEREST CAPITALISM occurred when a loan repayment period is missed, therefore, the amount missed is capitalized which in turn increases the total loan balance.
Hello there.
<span>The Accounts Receivable account has total debit postings of $1,900 and credit postings of $1,100. The balance of the account is a/an
Answer: </span><span>A. $800 debit.
</span>
Answer:
systematic risk ,diversifiable risk
Explanation:
risk premium is the investment return demanded by an investor for buying a risky assets that an investment is anticipated to deliver it reward to those who are willing to take higher risk than investors who prefer risk free investment.
systematic risk when economic treds influence assets and the market in similr way than investment risk for similr assets are corellated Systematic risk cannot be diversified away. Non-systematic risk, or the risk unique to each individual security, meanwhile, can be mitigated through diversification.
conclusion: both the sytematic and nom systematic risk are the influencing factor of the risk premium while sytematic risk is not influenced by market but diversfiable risk are influenced by market .
brainly.com/question/14055202?utm_source=android&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=question
#spj4
Answer:
70 days
Explanation:
For computing the number of days first we have to determine the credit turnover ratio which is shown below:
Credit turnover ratio is
= (Cost of Goods Sold ÷ Average accounts payable)
= ($45,021 ÷ $8,583)
= 5.245 times
Now the number of days is
= Total number of days in a year ÷ credit turnover ratio
= 365 ÷ 5.245
= 70 days
It is the example of the decision of an arbitrator. At its
discretion, a court may grant the equitable remedy of injunction against breach
of a contractual duty where damages would be inadequate. When a breach of
contract occurs, the non-breaching party is required to take reasonable steps
to lessen or mitigate the damages that he may sustain.
