<h3>
Answer: Choice A) 212 square meters</h3>
========================================================
Explanation:
14.10 has four sig figs. The 0 at the end is significant. This measurement is accurate to the hundredths place. If the author wrote 14.1, then it would be accurate to the tenths place with three sig figs.
15.0 has three sig figs. The 0 is significant. If they wrote 15 or 15. then we'd be dealing with 2 sig figs instead; however they placed the 0 there to tell the reader "this measurement is accurate to the tenths place"
---------------------
Multiply the values given
14.10*15.0 = 211.5
Round that to three sig figs. We pick the smaller sig fig count to round to since we cannot be certain it is accurate to four sig figs. In a sense, we pick the weakest link and use that to determine rounding when it comes to multiplication and division.
This means 211.5 rounds to 212
Answer:
There is no sufficient evidence to reject the company's claim at the significance level of 0.05
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
be the true mean weight per apple the company ship. We want to test the next hypothesis
vs
(two-tailed test).
Because we have a large sample of size n = 49 apples randomly selected from a shipment, the test statistic is given by
which is normally distributed. The observed value is
. The rejection region for
is given by RR = {z| z < -1.96 or z > 1.96} where the area below -1.96 and under the standard normal density is 0.025; and the area above 1.96 and under the standard normal density is 0.025 as well. Because the observed value 1.4583 does not fall inside the rejection region RR, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
First row all correct second rows all wrong and the first on of third row is correct be the last two are incorrect
I believe that the zeros would be -2 and -6, assuming that the first 2 that you wrote in the equation is supposed to be a power to the x.
I think the answer you have there is correct