Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
The utility maximization point for a consumer is as follows:

It is given that,
price of Pepsi(x) = $1 per can
price of a hamburger(y) = $2
Marginal utility from Pepsi = 4
Marginal utility from hamburgers = 6
Hence,

4 > 3
Therefore, it can be seen that the consumer's utility is not maximized at this point.
Law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the consumer consumes more and more quantity of goods then as a result the utility obtained from the consumption goes on diminishing.
So, there is a need to increase the quantity of Pepsi consumed and reducing the quantity of hamburgers consumed.
I would have to say stable and idkh to explain it thou sorry god luck
Answer:
i think that income is built for order and human need
Explanation:
if we distributed according to human need that's technically a communist country
<span>For Auslese, the medium sweet wine is made from late picked ripe grapes that are affected by Noble Rot. For Beerenauslese, a very sweet wine is made from very ripe grapes that are affected by Noble Rot. For Trockenbeerenauslese, a very sweet wine made from even riper grapes that are affected by Noble Rot.</span>
Answer:
Price will be 6.6
Explanation:
You can find the attached file.