1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
My name is Ann [436]
3 years ago
14

The following question refers to a hypothetical situation. Polls show that the country overwhelmingly agrees that we need a high

-speed rail system to connect the east and west coasts and everything in between. The president schedules a Cabinet meeting to discuss whether or not the project can be included in the federal budget. Given this information, which non-permanent Cabinet member would most likely be asked to attend the meeting? A. secretary of transportation B. secretary of the interior C. chairperson of the Council of Economic Advisors D. director of the Office of Budget and Management Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
Law
1 answer:
mel-nik [20]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D. Director of the Office of Budget and Management

Explanation:

I would say D. Director of the Office of Budget and Management (OMB).

The Director of the OMB is responsible for drafting, adapting, and managing the President's budget, as well as ensuring it is in cooperation with all federal policies, as well as the President's. To me, the OMB Director would be the most logical to attend.

You might be interested in
Give the most space to ___*
qaws [65]

Answer:

(D) The biggest hazard

Explanation:

The safest option is to give the most space to the biggest hazard

This is because if the car is being unsafe then you are out of the way from harm. The largest vehicle, the fastest road user of a potential drunk driver may not be a big hazard.

If you know someone is being unsafe on the road and you can see it, then you need to back off or speed up, and not be next to or around them.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the steps in the arrest and prosecution of someone who is accused of a felony. Your response should be at least 150 word
choli [55]

Answer:

take what you need

Explanation:

Arrest

Criminal prosecution typically begins with an arrest by a police officer. A police officer may arrest a person if (1) the officer observes the person committing a crime; (2) the officer has probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed by that person; or (3) the officer makes the arrest under the authority of a valid arrest warrant. After the arrest, the police books the suspect. When the police complete the booking process, they place the suspect in custody. If the suspect commited a minor offense, the policy may issue a citation to the suspect with instructions to appear in court at a later date.

Bail

If a suspect in police custody is granted bail, the suspect may pay the bail amount in exchange for a release. Release on bail is contingent on the suspect's promise to appear at all scheduled court proceedings. Bail may be granted to a suspect immediately after booking or at a later bail review hearing. Alternatively, a suspect may be released on his "own recognizance." A suspect released on his own recognizance need not post bail, but must promise in writing to appear at all scheduled court appearances. Own recognizance release is granted after the court considers the seriousness of the offense, and the suspect's criminal record, threat to the community and ties to family and employment.

Arraignment

The suspect makes his first court appearance at the arraignment. During arraignment, the judge reads the charges filed against the defendant in the complaint and the defendant chooses to plead "guilty," "not guilty" or "no contest" to those charges. The judge will also review the defendant's bail and set dates for future proceedings.

Preliminary Hearing or Grand Jury Proceedings

The government generally brings criminal charges in one of two ways: by a "bill of information" secured by a preliminary hearing or by grand jury indictment. In the federal system, cases must be brought by indictment. States, however, are free to use either process. Both preliminary hearings and grand juries are used to establish the existence of probable cause. If there is no finding of probable cause, a defendant will not be forced to stand trial.

A preliminary hearing, or preliminary examination, is an adversarial proceeding in which counsel questions witnesses and both parties makes arguments. The judge then makes the ultimate finding of probable cause. The grand jury, on the other hand, hears only from the prosecutor. The grand jury may call their own witnesses and request that further investigations be performed. The grand jury then decides whether sufficient evidence has been presented to indict the defendant.

Pre-Trial Motions

Pre-trial motions are brought by both the prosecution and the defense in order to resolve final issues and establish what evidence and testimony will be admissible at trial.

Trial

At trial, the judge or the jury will either find the defendant guilty or not guilty. The prosecution bears the burden of proof in a criminal trial. Thus, the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crimes charged. The defendant has a constitutional right to a jury trial in most criminal matters. A jury or judge makes the final determination of guilt or innocence after listening to opening and closing statements, examination and cross-examination of witnesses and jury instructions. If the jury fails to reach a unanimous verdict, the judge may declare a mistrial, and the case will either be dismissed or a new jury will be chosen. If a judge or jury finds the defendant guilty, the court will sentence the defendant.

Sentencing

During the sentencing phase of a criminal case, the court determines the appropriate punishment for the convicted defendant. In determining a suitable sentence, the court will consider a number of factors, including the nature and severity of the crime, the defendant's criminal history, the defendant's personal circumstances and the degree of remorse felt by the defendant.

Appeal

An individual convicted of a crime may ask that his or her case be reviewed by a higher court. If that court finds an error in the case or the sentence imposed, the court may reverse the conviction or find that the case should be re-tried.

4 0
3 years ago
The primary mission of police is to fight crime and immediately respond to
Maksim231197 [3]
I think the answer is true
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Economic Survey
artcher [175]

The case portrays the need for a review of income and property taxes, highlighting information on which taxes should or should not have their exemption limits extended and how this affects the country's infrastructure.

Accordingly, we can answer the other questions as follows:

  1. Economic research is against increasing the income tax exemption limit, as this would harm the poorest population.
  2. The research states that the property tax is important for the growth of the country's infrastructure, in addition to falling on objects that are easy to identify and that belong to the richest population.

<h3>How does the survey present this information?</h3>

The research shows that the income import should matter the exemption in the poorest population and this is a way to promote more taxpayers for this tax. This is because by allowing poor people to be exempt from income tax, the State promotes economic ascension, allowing these people to reach higher economic levels and leave the lower classes, becoming taxpayers.

However, the research is in favor of extending the exemption limits for property tax. This is because these taxes must fall on people who own buildings and residences. These people have a higher economic standard and are easily identified since the properties are immovable assets.

Learn more about income tax:

brainly.com/question/17075354

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Can you place an 11-year-old in Jail for abusing a 4-year-old? This includes the 11-year-old shutting the 4-year-old in closets,
FrozenT [24]

Yes, it would depend on the nation or state, but yes that 11 year old could be charged with abuse if the level of abuse hits a breaking point. It would also depend on how often this occurs, the severity, and actions taken by the parents to intervene. The more valuable proof would come from signs of abuse, such as trauma or bruising, but a video would suffice the start of an investigation. If you or someone you know is being abused, call 9-11 or 1-800-799-7233 (National Domestic Violence Hotline).

I hope this helps! And please stay safe.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If the President rejects a bin<br> what is needed to pass the<br> bill?
    11·1 answer
  • Plz hurry idk how to do this :/
    10·1 answer
  • A person may legally ride in the back of a pickup truck when: The sides of the pickup bed are at least 24 inches high. The back
    6·1 answer
  • Diferencie preclusão lógica do venire contra factum proprio.
    13·1 answer
  • What was a major problem with the central government under the Articles of Confederation?
    13·2 answers
  • Do you think the Constitution does more to protect a person's rights or limit them? Explain your answer.
    10·1 answer
  • All the news stations start reporting that a person in public office is accepting money in exchange for his vote in the legislat
    8·1 answer
  • Free brainly to whoever answers! (chosen randomly)
    12·2 answers
  • Who is the chief administrator of a prison?<br> A _______ is the chief administrator of a prison.
    14·1 answer
  • Mona had a disability and used a wheelchair. She was often asked to work
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!