<em>Answer</em><em>:</em>
<em>B</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>E</em><em>V</em><em>E</em><em>R</em><em>Y</em><em>O</em><em>N</em><em>E</em><em> </em><em>D</em><em>E</em><em>C</em><em>I</em><em>D</em><em>E</em><em>S</em><em> </em><em>T</em><em>O</em><em> </em><em>E</em><em>A</em><em>T</em><em> </em><em>L</em><em>O</em><em>W</em><em> </em><em>C</em><em>A</em><em>R</em><em>B</em>
<em>H</em><em>O</em><em>P</em><em>E</em><em> </em><em>I</em><em>T</em><em> </em><em>H</em><em>E</em><em>L</em><em>P</em><em>S</em><em> </em><em>Y</em><em>O</em><em>U</em>
<em>T</em><em>H</em><em>A</em><em>N</em><em>K</em><em> </em><em>YOU</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
Answer:
B. The court is authorized to hear the case and make a ruling after considering the arguments.
Explanation:
The jurisdiction in legal terms refers to the geographical coverage or reach of a case to be tried, heard, and decide on the matter. This means that cases of any legal matter are tried according to their jurisdictional situations.
In cases of a court that has jurisdiction over a legal dispute, the court is at the liberty to hear and decide on the matter. The court can hear the case and make a ruling after all arguments are presented. The jurisdiction allows the court to act on the case as it likes. This means that the court has the right to make any ruling regarding the case as it has jurisdiction over it.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
Answer:
The difference is that Justification is a social Defense and a Excuse Defense is a mental disorder or something physical wrong with them
Explanation:
Excuse defence is when the defendant admits to committing a criminal act but believes that he or she cannot be held responsible because there was no criminal intent. Excuse defences that are used in courts today are; Age, Mental Disorder, Automatism, Mistake of Fact and Mistake of Law.
Justification is a defense in a criminal case, by which a defendant who committed the crime as defined, claims they did no wrong, because committing the crime advanced some social interest or vindicated a right of such importance that it outweighs the wrongfulness of the crime.
This is tricky but I would go with generally, yes.
Side note: However, I feel like that would have some major consequences!^