Well germany’s economy was terrible after world war one (if that’s the war that you’re talking about) and the economy in the US during the depression was also obviously terrible. there was a lot of inflation in both regions.
In the "person-situation debate" amongst psychologists, Traits are a false notion. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be beneficial to examine how they respond differently in particular circumstances.
<h3>Which side of the person-situation argument did Mischel take?</h3>
In the psychological community's "person-situation argument," Walter Mischel played a significant role. Character traits are a myth. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be useful to examine the various responses in particular circumstances.
<h3>What exactly is the person-situation argument?</h3>
Nature versus. nurture argument in personality psychology concerns which factor, a person or an environment, is more crucial in predicting what people will do. There is too much variation in behavior across contexts for attributes to adequately describe individual variations.
Learn more about psychologists here:-
brainly.com/question/28321133
#SPJ4
Answer:
1. acaia tree > lion
2. giraffe >lion > cheetah
3. grass > ant > aardvark > hyena
Explanation:
I hope it helps I cant really read it that well enjoy fifth grade tho i miss being a lil kid
let me know if further assistance is needed
The interaction pattern that occurs when group members take turns talking is known as round robin.
Communication processes and interaction patterns are basic social psychology. they're the parts of social interactions that influence the behavior and attitudes of group members. As a method, communication involves the transmission of a message from a sender to a receiver.
Round-Robin is a great tool for having your team generate concepts, while not being influenced unduly by others within the group. This ensures that everybody on your team gets an equal say within the concepts that you just generate.
To learn more about Round robin here
brainly.com/question/20936678
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
One interesting thing about America’s 19th-century Pacific expansion is that it happened during, and even before, its more famous western settlement. American missionaries and sugar planters were in Hawaii in the 1820s, a generation before the California Gold Rush or Mormon Trek to Utah. The reason is that, while oceans can be deadly in strong winds, water is normally easier to traverse than land — even the long and torturous pre-Panama Canal sea route around Cape Horn from the East Coast to the Pacific. By 1890, when the Census Bureau declared the western frontier closed, the U.S. had already laid claim to territory in the Pacific. By 1902, America controlled Hawaii, Alaska, the Philippines, Guam, Midway Island, part of Samoa and several smaller islands in the Pacific (e.g. Palmyra Atoll and Wake, Jarvis, Howland & Baker Islands). Since its revolution and initiation of the Old China Trade routes starting in 1783, the U.S. coveted trading with Asians the way it had traditionally with Europeans. In the 1850s, Commodore Matthew Perry sailed the U.S. Navy to China and Japan to increase trade. By the turn of the 20th century, America was digging a canal shortcut between the Atlantic and Pacific and was in combat defending its interests in Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean. In this chapter, we’ll cover why and how America stepped out onto this world stage
