The main takeaway of the Stanford experiment is social roles are powerful determinants of human behavior.
<h3>What is the Stanford Prison Experiment?</h3>
Zimbardo and his colleagues wanted to know if the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was due to the guards' sadistic personalities (i.e., dispositional) or had more to do with the prison environment (i.e., situational).
The Stanford Prison Experiment, according to Zimbardo and his colleagues, revealed how people readily conform to the social roles they are expected to play, especially when the roles are as strongly stereotyped as those of prison guards. When the guards were given authority, they began to act in ways they would not normally act in their normal lives.
Therefore. the environment (prison) was an important factor in creating the guards' brutal behavior. The findings support the situational rather than the dispositional explanation of behavior.
To learn more about Stanford Prison Experiment, click here: brainly.com/question/5014785
#SPJ1
Answer:
My guess would be C: The government might have to hire people from other countries.
I believe the answer is: Demographic audiences analysis
demographic audience analysis refers to the process of collecting data from potential market from various age, gender, race, religion, economic status, etc in order to find out their pattern of behavior.
The result from : Demographic audiences analysis could be used to create advertising strategies that target specific demographic.
Answer:
face validity
Explanation:
Face validity refers to the degree to which an assessment or test subjectively appears to measure the variable or construct that it is supposed to measure. In other words, face validity is when an assessment or test appears to do what it claims to do
Answer:
In the past, learners were required to achieve at least 50% in four specific designated subjects that were the same nationwide. However, this was recently changed - the new requirements include attaining the same percentage in any four subjects that have 20 credits from a list of subjects.
This change has certain advantages and disadvantages. The advantage is that there will be more students with better percentages applying for various high education institutions as it should now be easier for them to pick subjects they are most confident in and that will be relevant for their further education. Their focus will also be on those most important subjects for them and their studies instead of on something they might not even need in their future career.
However, a disadvantage is that students might pick subjects they find easiest just to secure their place in a university. Those subjects ultimately might not provide them with needed strategies for thinking and learning that otherwise designated subjects might have. Furthermore, some higher education institutions might have their own lists of designated subjects and minimum entry requirements that might not be the same as the student's choices.
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you