The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
One of the dilemmas Spain faced regarding the new colonies established by them was the powerful international presence of the Spanish crown in those new territories against the cost of maintaining that presence.
It is well known that the Spanish conquerors wanted to exploit the many raw materials and natural resources in their colonies to enrich the Spanish crown. However, there was an implicit cost in this feat. Indeed, a high cost it was.
Furthermore, the fear Spanish had of possible occupations by French or English settlers of territories such as Florida, made them accept the presence of Native American Indian tribes like the Seminoles. trying to protect its large peninsula.
The UN commission conclude about the events in Darfur is human rights had been violated, but that the conflict was not genocide
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Commission concluded that the Government of Sudan has not attempted a policy of genocide. Arguably, two elements of genocide might be gathered from the gross violations of human rights committed by Government forces and the militias under their control.
These two elements are, first, the actus reus consisting of killing, or causing serious bodily or mental harm; and, second, based on a subjective standard, the presence of a defended group being targeted by the authors of criminal conduct.
The Agricultural Adjustment Act, passed in 1933, created the Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA). The AAA is an example of both recovery and reform. It followed Keynesian ideals by paying farmers money to leave plots empty and killed off food surplus to increase demand and price for farming products, helping farmers recover from crises. The AAA is also an example of reform because it set the maximum output of some farming products to prevent future depressions and set precedent in government's role in agriculture planning.
The answer is B-Tom thumb, hope this helps, have a great day! :)
In The Republic, Plato outlines his view on leadership through a discussion on civic and political life in the Polis, the Grecian city state. Apart from focusing on the meaning of justice, he also develops a framework on the nature of leadership in an ideal state.
Be a “lover of wisdom,” a cardinal virtue
Plato was dissatisfied with rulers who lacked knowledge and moral strength to act according to the common good – in other words, rulers motivated by self-interest were not strong leaders. Plato proposes instead that states should be governed by philosophers and be a lover of wisdom, which is the meaning of the Greek word, philosophia.
