Answer:
https://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/aclk?sa=L&ai=DChcSEwjvlZjE3-PmAhXVGo8KHQCdC-YYABAAGgJzYg&ae=1&ohost=www.google.com&cid=CAESQOD2Mig2p8L8izHci_oxUn--_XI4MJ-MJS7GIV7OoIWXqbrvQho0a86o2u-dzSbFbB1fB2oIr5WH9ccCxnp6pbg&sig=AOD64_2uFTw9VAw6YcvPt6IZY4_l9dTRhg&q&adurl=https://www.pebblestonedrive.com/anthracite-filter-media.html&ved=2ahUKEwiWspDE3-PmAhU4yzgGHbphDyAQ0Qx6BAgFEAE
Answer:
On May 29, 1453, after an Ottoman army stormed Constantinople, Mehmed triumphantly entered the Hagia Sophia, which would soon be converted to the city's leading mosque. ... Emperor Constantine XI died in battle that day, and the Byzantine Empire collapsed, ushering in the long reign of the Ottoman Empire.
Explanation:
Answer:
For a succsessful country to run they need to create alliences with other countries
Explanation:
For the answer to the question above, are you referring to colonial period?
because during the colonial period, European women in America remained entitled to the legal protections provided by imperial authorities, even when they occupied unfree statuses, such as indentured servitude. For instance, when masters or mistresses mistreated their indentured servant women physically violated the terms of their labor contracts, the servants had a right to complain at the local court for redress; in some jurisdictions, their pleas met with remedies from the bench. Nevertheless, patriarchal models of authority prevailed, and despite their access to the courts, indentured women remained restricted by a series of laws that gave their masters extensive powers over them. They could not marry or travel while under contract, and if they ran away, became pregnant, or challenged their masters, they would be penalized with extra terms of service. While the law in Virginia, for instance, penalized masters who impregnated their servant women by freeing the latter, at the same time the statute averred that such women might be unfairly “induced to lay all their illegitimate to their masters” in order to gain their freedom. The statutory language is clearly indicative of class-based notions of dissolute sexuality. Indeed, the statutes enacted across imperial North America, like those iterated above, were devoted to creating and enforcing differences among women on the basis of not only race but class as well.