Answer:
Case study
Explanation:
Mateo was reading about Konrad Lorenz for his psychology class. Lorenz was able to get goslings to become attached to him, thus demonstrating the imprinting phenomenon. These goslings were the subject of a case study, which is a descriptive method that closely examines an individual or a small group.
Case study is a research strategy and an empirical inquiry that investigates a phenomenon to generate an in depth understanding of a complex issues within its real life context,it is used to gain a better understanding of a subject or process and used to narrow down a very broad field.Freud's works and theories were mostly developed through the use of individual case studies.
Answer: D. Systematic
Explanation: Harmon clothing is likely experiencing a systematic political risk. A systematic political risk can be explained as the political events, decision or regulations which can negatively affect the growth or survival of a business or investment in a particular country. Systematic political risks may affect all segments of a country's market or it might be targeted towards a particular sector or market segment. Systematic political risk may stem from wholesale change in policies and regulation of the host government due to change of power or shift in major economic decisions or protocol.
Answer:
A. To oversee the operation of executive departments
Explanation:
The executive departments consist of several organizations which were created to execute the government programs that are proposed by the legislative branch.
Currently, United States have 15 Executive departments. It is impossible for president to personally lead each department alone. This was the reason for the cabinet members.
The president personally select each cabinet members based on a specific skill sets or other criteria's so they can run each departments on the president's behalf.
Answer: According to Tetlock argument, Expert with good predictive power should be willing to;
• EXPLORE DIVERSE INFORMATION AND ANALYTICAL MODEL
• CHALLENGE CONVENTIONAL WISDOM
• BE COMFORTABLE WITH COMPLEXITY AND UNCERTAINTY.
Therefore option b,c,e is the right answer.
Explanation: The predictive power of a scientist is the power a scientist has to generate a testable prediction, thereby making its theory to be a testable prediction.
For an expert to have good predictive power it must have the ability to explore diverse information and analytical model, because when you explore different information and analyse it in the best form, you will be able to postulate more information and discoveries, which can help you to predict a testable theory. By exploring you are trying to challenge conventional wisdom, of why should this be this?, You may get confused and uncertain at a point. But if he you have a good predictive power, you can be able to absorb it all to achieve your discovery and produce a scientific theory with a predictive power.
