I would say that the best way to say it is that it is most concerned with the human: human rationality and search for pleasure and fulfillment, the way humans experience and find earthy pleasures and with the human psyche.
That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
I am pretty sure that the vikings would said their ships downriver as the river would carry the ship while the vikings attack making it easier to control rather going the opposite, which is fighting against the river, thus reducing the amount of troops in doing the raiding.
Hope this helps!
What geographical feature to both Germany and Russia share
