Really, we don't need to use that much math--we can use logic instead. Since the two congruent sides must be longer than 30in, the total has to be greater than 60in (the longest side plus the congruent sides.) So for our answer, we want the smallest total that is above sixty, which in this case is 72.44in.
Hope I helped, and let me know if you have any questions :) I can explain the real math if you want, it was just unnecessary here.
The answer is 3x10^12 also can i get brainliest please??
Answer:
d = 17
Step-by-step explanation:
d = √ (9 − 1) 2 + (15− 0)^2
d = √ (8) ^2 + (15) ^2
d = √ 64 + 225
d = √289
d = 17
Answer:
Based on expert opinion the regression does not suffer from omitted variable bias
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Based on expert opinion the regression does not suffer from omitted variable bias </em>because its indicators taking values of 1 and 0 where 1 would represent taking action by the legal system and 0 would represent not taking action by the legal system. as
The researcher plans to regress national income per capita based on the effect of the legal system
applying the formula for addressing omitted variable bias ( attached below )
2.5 years = 30 months
7500$ in 30 months
x$ in 1 month
___________________
x = (7500*1)/30 = 250
The answer is 250$/month.
