1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergeinik [125]
3 years ago
9

When the company assigns factory labor costs to jobs, the direct labor cost is debited to Factory Labor. Manufacturing Overhead.

Work in Process Inventory. Direct Labor.
Business
1 answer:
icang [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: work in process inventory

Explanation:

The direct labor costs refers to the costs that is incurred by a company which has to do with the payment to the employees involved in the production activities of the company.

When a company assigns factory labor costs to jobs, then the direct labor cost is debited to the work in process inventory.

You might be interested in
Explain two situations where scarcity effects you
s344n2d4d5 [400]
When I got into a crash ig
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Usually, the decision to notify parties outside the client’s organization regarding noncompliance with laws and regulations is t
Daniel [21]

Answer:

Management

Explanation:

Sometimes in the course of discharging his duties, an auditor might discover a case of non-compliance with laws and regulations. In such situations, he is expected to report the issue to the governing body or management of the organization who in turn notify parties outside the client's organization. This might imply reporting to the appropriate law enforcement agencies who now investigate the matter.

The auditor should ensure that he is keeping to the code of confidentiality before proceeding on such a case. The management is expected to review the report to determine if the action was indeed non-compliant with the laws before proceeding on the next call of action.

6 0
3 years ago
Barbara's Bakery purchased three new 7-year assets last year. She chose NOT to use Section 179 immediate expensing or take bonus
frez [133]

Answer:

$ 4,748

Explanation:

The depreciation expenses = $(\$ 15000 \times 17.85 \%) + (\$ 6000 \times 10.71 \%)+(\$ 40000 \times 3.57 \%)$

$= \$ 2677.50 + \$ 642.6 + \$ 1428$

= $ 4748

Generally we have use half year convention for assets that are purchased during the year but here we used the mid quarter as of more than the 40% of the assets are being purchased in last quarter of the year

$=\frac{\text{assets purchased in last quarter}}{\text{total assets purchased in the year}} \times 100$

$=\frac{40000}{61000} \times 100$

$=65.57 \%$ (it is more than 40%)

Thus we can use the mid quarter mars depreciation rates for the 7 years assets that are purchased this year.

8 0
3 years ago
According to the research literature on strategy and structure, the relationship between strategy and structure most strongly im
Marrrta [24]

Answer: Option B

Explanation: An organization and arrangement of interrelated elements can be defined as the structure of the primary subject. In simple words it can be described as many party of an element put together.

Strategy can be defined as the method or plan made to achieve future goals or objectives.

a. Strategy formulation cannot be done with out taking into consideration the structure. for example- a company with debt in its financial structure cannot take same risks as company with equity in its financial structure.

b. wrong strategy formulation can effect structure severely similarly structure of the organisation must be taken into consideration before

making strategy.

c. Structure of organisation is the primary consideration in making strategy thus its influence will be high.

Therefore right answer is statement B .

8 0
3 years ago
Discuss the concept of downsizing and provide 4 of the hidden costs associated with it.
MrRissso [65]

Answer:

firms that lay off staff can see a significant reduction in the performance of their remaining workers, according to our experimental study. our research suggests that firms that decide to ‘downsize’ their workforce should be wary of how the layoff decision is perceived by the remaining (“surviving”) workers. if the surviving staff interpret the decision as a way to boost profits at the cost of the workers, they might react negatively.

lay-offs are an integral part of dynamic economies. for example, in germany at least one large firm announces cuts of at least 800 jobs on each third working day of the year. lay-offs impose massive costs on the displaced workers, the regional economy and social insurances. hence, it is no surprise that layoffs are often discussed controversially in the general public and the media, and receive a lot of attention by scholars and practitioners.

from the firm’s perspective, the benefits of lay-offs seem to be obvious – in particular, labor costs and organisational slack can be reduced. firms considering laying off workers have to weigh these benefits with potential costs. some types of costs (e.g. severance payments) are more or less calculable in advance, while other costs are ex ante hard to estimate. in particular, there may be substantial costs associated with a decrease in the motivation of the workers who stay in firms after lay-offs – a phenomenon called ‘survivor syndrome’.

we set up a lab experiment with 400 students at the goethe-university frankfurt to study how non-fired employees respond to an employer’s

decision to fire a co-worker. in our experiment, employees work for an employer whose payoff depends on the employees’ performance in a real-effort task. subsequently, the employer is provided with an incentive to layoff one of her/his employees. after her/his decision for or against firing, the remaining employees continue to work for the employer.

to analyse whether the remaining employees’ performance is driven by the employer’s decision to layoff an employee or its implementation, we conduct a control treatment in which it is randomly decided whether an employee is fired or not.

we find that survivors reduce their performance substantially in response to the employer’s decision to lay off a co-worker. the reduction is strongest for survivors who interpret the employer’s decision as a method to increase profits at the cost of the workers; it is weaker if they can comprehend the layoff decision, and it vanishes (in the control treatment) if the employer is forced to fire a co-worker. it seems that the survivors in our experiment perceive an employer’s decision to lay off a co-worker as a signal that she does not expect them to perform well or cares more about her/his own payoff than the well-being of the employees. our results suggest that this negative signal leads to a decrease in employees’ performance.

our experimental results imply that firms deciding in favour of layoffs should be wary about how their decision is perceived by their workforce. in firms laying off workers, one can observe a number of business practices that are puzzling at first glance. our study can provide one potential explanations for these practices.

first, firms often use natural fluctuations to reduce the level of staffing instead of firing workers. the existence of such a policy is quite surprising – firms can more rapidly adjust their labor force by simply firing some workers. one potential explanation for this business practice could be that firms try to mitigate the survivor syndrome.

a second fact is that firms laying off workers often claim that they have “no choice”. a rational for this communication strategy could be that firms try to prevent that employees perceive the employer’s layoff decision as an attempt to increase profits at the cost of the workers. it is, however, an open question whether employees really believe management’s declaration. one way to verify declarations could be a strong cooperation with the works council.

third, research has shown that top management turnover is higher after downsizing. one explanation for this phenomenon could be that firms try to limit the negative impact of the lay-off decision by separating from the management with the lay-off history. after the separation, the new management can blame the predecessors.

a fourth fact is that firms that are downsizing often provide outplacement services for the leavers, and make financial offers for voluntary leavers (even if these offers are quite expensive and, because of their better outside options, the more able workers who separate). a rational for such business practices could be that firms try to attenuate the negative signal of the lay-off decision by the provision of positive signals.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A key use of a customer survey used in the operations consulting phase of problem definition is customer loyalty analysis. True
    11·1 answer
  • Suppose that a country has the resources to produce 3 million cars & 100 million tons of iron ore every year. why is it a pr
    8·1 answer
  • Select the statement that does not support the narrow view of non-managerial employees' responsibilities to their employer, the
    10·1 answer
  • Jennifer works as a clerk in a company. The essential function of her job is producing memoranda using word processing software.
    12·1 answer
  • The evms term that represents the value of work actually accomplished is:
    13·1 answer
  • Last year, Capriana Corporation (CC) had sales of $200 million, and its inventory turnover ratio was 5.0. The CC’s current asset
    11·1 answer
  • Which account is an example of a contra-expense account?
    9·2 answers
  • After purchasing a fancy cut diamond ring for his wife, jason feels dissatisfied with his purchase as he feels that the ring was
    13·1 answer
  • All of the following are reasons why some countries are more efficient than others at using capital and labor, except:
    9·1 answer
  • You have $1200 to invest in a bank account with an interest rate of 5.5%, compounded monthly. After how many years will your acc
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!