Answer: Subjective
Explanation: From the Scenario and the listed Feedbacks are subjective from the survey polled because they do not have the accurate figures to create a opinion about unhealthy smoking among Mexican American adolescents.
Answer:
1) Real GDP = Base year price X Current year quantity
Real GDP for 2009 using 2009 as base year = 5 X 100 + 40 X 20 = 500 + 800 = 1300
2) Real GDP for 2009 using 2010 as base year = 5.25 X 100 + 24 X 20 = 525 + 480 = 1005
3) Real GDP for 2010 using 2009 as base year = 5 X 110 + 40 X 30 = 550 + 1200 = 1750
4) Real GDP for 2010 using 2010 as base year = 5.25 X 110 + 24 X 30 = 577.5 + 720 = 1297.5
5) GDP growth rate using 2009 as base year = (Real GDP for 2010 - Real GDP for 2009)/Real GDP for 2009 X 100
= (1750 - 1300)/1300 X 100 = 450/13 = 34.61
6) GDP growth rate using 2010 as base year = (1297.5 - 1005)/1005 X 100 = 29.10
7) Arithmetic average of growth rates = (34.61 + 29.10)/2 = 63.71/2 = 31.85
Given the scenario, Sally's employer is still responsible for these reasons:
<em> A. Yes, because this type of incident falls under the OSH Act's General Duty Clause,
</em>
<em />
<em>B. Yes, because Larry did not follow safe work practices by rushing down the hall with the cart.</em>
The responsibility of Sally's employer does not end because the accident is not specifically addressed in the OSHA standards.
At least, the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act requires employers to provide safe work environments free from recognized present or future hazards.
Thus, Larry's action is a recognized hazard that could have been prevented from happening if wider hallways are built, for example.
Read more about Employer and Employee OSHA Responsibilities at brainly.com/question/20427532
Answer:
D. $68,000
Explanation:
The total amount of bad debt expense that should be reported for the year is $68,000. This is because since the company has a debit balance of $8,000 at the beginning of the year, the uncollectible of $60,000 would be added to the debit balance hence equals $68,000 which would serve as bad debt expense.
Answer:
How would private property rights help explain why Taiwan is now so much wealthier than Liberia?
<em>Taiwan is so much wealthier than Liberia in terms of the use of Private property rights because the Taiwanese have many exportable products they have Private Property rights on. The Taiwanese started building from copying technologies of sub-standard goods to quality goods over the years of improvement while the Liberian fought a prolonged civil war without a change to produce products to have a Private Property right on.</em>
Explanation:
<em>The Book of Things</em><em> </em>in Taiwan Civil Code was overhauled between 2007 and 2010. This chapter coded the amendments and found:
(1). 97% of the proposals by the task force (composed of property scholars and judges) were accepted verbatim by the legislature;
(2). Property laws in Japan, Germany, and Switzerland heavily influenced this round of amendments. The (unconventional) story behind the legal changes is that scholars and judges are the <em>“interest group</em>” that drives these amendments.