All categories

2 years ago

Employer and Worker Responsibilities

Business

1 answer:

HACTEHA [7]2 years ago

3 0

Given the scenario, Sally's employer is still responsible for these reasons:

A. Yes, because this type of incident falls under the OSH Act's General Duty Clause,

B. Yes, because Larry did not follow safe work practices by rushing down the hall with the cart.

The responsibility of Sally's employer does not end because the accident is not specifically addressed in the OSHA standards.

At least, the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act requires employers to provide safe work environments free from recognized present or future hazards.

Thus, Larry's action is a recognized hazard that could have been prevented from happening if wider hallways are built, for example.

Read more about Employer and Employee OSHA Responsibilities at brainly.com/question/20427532

You might be interested in

Hackers want information about a target person, organization, and _______ to assist in compromising security.

Delvig [45]

Hackers want information about a target person, organization, and system to assist in compromising security.Hackers want information about the system, because having the system information facilitates the task of a cyber detective.

3 0

3 years ago

Martin received a nonstatutory stock option from his employer on January 1, 2018. The option gives him the right to purchase 100

Ksju [112]

Answer:

Correct answer is option A

Explanation:

In case of non-statutory stock option, income which is fair market value less any cost incurred for stock options, is included when the stock options are exercised.

5 0

3 years ago

Suppose there are only two firms that sell smartphones: Flashfone and Pictech. The payoff matrix that follows shows the profit (

Vladimir [108]

Answer:

Flashfone and Pictech

The Nash equilibrium is achieved when Pictech and Flashfone price their smartphones high without the other party changing their strategy.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Pictech

High Low

High 8 8 3 10

Flashfone

Low 10 3 5 5

b) By acting at the Nash equilibrium and pricing their smartphones high, Pictech and Flashfone achieve a payoff of $8 million respectively. This payoff level does not put any of the two firms at a disadvantage.

7 0

3 years ago

As the marketing manager, you know the product (s) has to be right. The PC industry is competitive, lifecycles are short, and th

Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

no answer

hmm i dont get it

3 0

3 years ago

A grocery chain is interested in exploring the impact effective supply chain management would have. Suppose that for every $1 of

Verdich [7]

Answer:

$3.70

Explanation:

In this question we have to assume the items values

Let say

Sales = $100

So supply chain it spends 50% i.e $50

Profit is 4% i.e $4

Since the 46% is dividend among fixed and production costs

So the fixed cost is $23 and variable cost is $23

Now if the sales increase by $X, the revenue will increase by X.

So it would also increased the cost by X × (0.5+0.23)

And in overall, the profit is also increased

Plus it is given that there is 27% profit margin

So, the equation is

0.27X = 1

Therefore X = $3.70 with additional profit of $1

3 0

4 years ago