All categories

2 years ago

Employer and Worker Responsibilities

Business

1 answer:

HACTEHA [7]2 years ago

3 0

Given the scenario, Sally's employer is still responsible for these reasons:

A. Yes, because this type of incident falls under the OSH Act's General Duty Clause,

B. Yes, because Larry did not follow safe work practices by rushing down the hall with the cart.

The responsibility of Sally's employer does not end because the accident is not specifically addressed in the OSHA standards.

At least, the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act requires employers to provide safe work environments free from recognized present or future hazards.

Thus, Larry's action is a recognized hazard that could have been prevented from happening if wider hallways are built, for example.

Read more about Employer and Employee OSHA Responsibilities at brainly.com/question/20427532

You might be interested in

In capitalism what is pure competition?

inysia [295]

Answer:

Pure or perfect competition is a theoretical market structure in which the following criteria are met: All firms sell an identical product (the product is a "commodity" or "homogeneous"). All firms are price takers (they cannot influence the market price of their product). Market share has no influence on prices.

5 0

3 years ago

At a price of $15 each, Marta buys 4 books per month. When the price increases to $20, Marta buys 3 books per month. Luz says th

Lapatulllka [165]

Answer:

No, Luz is incorrect. Marta's quantity demanded has decreased, but her demand has stayed the same.

Explanation:

For $15 per book, the quantity demanded was 4 books per month.

When the price increases to $20 per book, the quantity demanded fell to 3 books per month.

This shows a decrease in the quantity demanded. A change in demand occurs when the price is constant and quantity demanded changes because of change in other factors. But here the other factors are constant and the quantity demanded is changing due to a change in price.

So, Luz's statement here is incorrect.

4 0

3 years ago

Roberto Designers was organized on January 1, 2018. The firm was authorized to issue 140,000 shares of $5 par value common stock

Phoenix [80]

Answer:

The total stockholder's equity at the end of the year will be $352,000.

Explanation:

The issue of common stock at $7/share= 14,000*$7=$98,000

The issue of common stock at $8/share= 28,000*$8=$224,000

The net income is $140,000.

The dividends paid= $70,000.

Purchase of treasury stock= 4000*$10=$40,000

The total stockholder's equity

=The issue of common stock at $7/share+The issue of common stock at $8/share+The net income-The dividends paid-Purchase of treasury stock

=$98,000+$224,000+$140,000- $70,000-$40,000

=$352,000.

7 0

4 years ago

What dynamics were used

Ksenya-84 [330]

Answer:

J.S. Bach used some dynamic terms, including forte, piano, più piano, and pianissimo (although written out as full words), and in some cases it may be that ppp was considered to mean pianissimo in this period.

8 0

3 years ago

"Shareholder wealth" in a firm is represented by:

Grace [21]

The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the fourth choice. "Shareholder wealth" in a firm is represented by the market price per share of the firm's common stock. I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!

6 0

3 years ago