1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zubka84 [21]
3 years ago
15

Why was the constitution written to be vague and act as a guiding principle of government

History
1 answer:
UNO [17]3 years ago
6 0
The Constitution may have been left unclear so that it can be flexable in the situation that the victum, subject, or criminal are in. 


Brainliest answer?
You might be interested in
What is the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968
faltersainse [42]
Its a bill that applies to the Indian tribes it gaurentees them the bill of rights
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It is against the law to send certain things through the mail. Do you think the government should be able to regulate what peopl
maw [93]

This question is meant as your personal opinion however based upon the laws and if you agree on them or not yes the government should be able to because the post office is a government owned agency therefore is run by the government and anybody working with him there is an employee of the city state and essentially the government

3 0
3 years ago
how did President Dwight Eisenhower explain why the Vanguard wasn’t successful before the Soviets launched Sputnik?
Brut [27]

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

President Dwight Eisenhower stated that Vanguard should not supposed to be in competition with the Soviet Union’s Sputnik. He attempted to make the United States citizens to realize that, contrary to the popular opinions, the two sides were not actually in any form of much talked space war.

Dwight Eisenhower further clarified that among many of the Vanguard's objectives is excellent cooperation between scientists generally, and at that moment was on schedule.

3 0
3 years ago
How are Karl Marx and Adam smith different between property ownership? Help me please
postnew [5]

Answer:

Karl Marx and Adam Smith are both very different when it comes to their views about property ownership.

Explanation:

Adam Smith defends private property and considers it to be not only one of the pillars of the market system, but of civilization itself.

Karl Marx, on the other hand, understands the function of private property in society, but criticizes the tendency that private property has to accumulate in a few hands, a phenomenon also known as capital accumulation, which Marx identifies as one of the pillars of capitalism. For this reason, Marx proposes an alternative property system based on common ownership, and this system is known as communism.

8 0
2 years ago
Leonardo da Vinci engaged in which activity, banned by the Church, in order to get detailed drawings of the human anatomy?
Ierofanga [76]
I’m sorry if it’s wrong but I think it’s
C.) Dissection
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How significant was the Spanish American war to the growth of the United States?
    9·1 answer
  • What three empires in western africa flourished because of the trans-saharan trade of gold and salt?
    12·2 answers
  • Which of these is a power of the Executive branch? A) declare war B) creates taxes C) ratifies treaties Eliminate D) commands ar
    14·1 answer
  • Describe miasma theory?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes Christopher Columbu's first letter from the Americas ?
    8·2 answers
  • Muhammad's followers wrote his prophecies and teachings into the ___, or
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following problems was not a challenge faced by cowboys on large cattle drives?
    12·2 answers
  • The English Bill of Rights (1689)
    15·1 answer
  • The diagram below shows that the Roman Republic contributed to the development of democratic principles.
    6·2 answers
  • Please help I’ll give brainlest
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!