Answer: Moral hazard
Explanation: As per economic principles, if an individual increases the exposure to risk when covered by insurance, moral hazard happens, particularly when an individual takes further risks just because someone carries the burden of all those consequences.
There can be a moral hazard at which one party's policies may modify to the disadvantage of someone else after a business transaction has occurred. Moral hazard may arise through a type of asymmetric information in which the threat-taking group to trade is more aware of its motives than the person bearing the risk's implications.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is A .
Answer:
When companies hire celebrities to advertise their products, they are attempting to make the demand for their product higher / more profitable. If this strategy is successful, the firm can raise both awareness and reputation / sales.
Explanation:
"Celebrity endorsement is a promotional tool that boosts brand awareness. It is a way of enhancing credibility and gaining visibility for brands. Celebrities are well-known people and a celebrity endorsement can make a brand stand out"
Reference: Elkins, Hashaw. “The Effect of Celebrities in Advertisements.” Small Business - Chron.com, 29 Mar. 2019
<span>In addition to their regular compensation, managers working abroad are awarded with international premiums.
Most workers overseas are paid/compensated higher for being in another country. These extra payments are known as international premiums which can be extra money for living, spending allowance, insurance, savings and healthcare. Depending on your role and your company, your benefits may vary slightly. </span>
A surf board shop for example. If you lived in a place like Ohio you’re not gonna have very many sales because there’s no ocean or surf parks near by. But if you lived somewhere like California you’re sales would be much better.
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
When an intoxicated person enters into a contract, the contract can either be enforceable, meaning held to the fullest extent of the law, or voidable by the intoxicated person. The court will look at two criteria that need to be present in order to make the contract voidable:
-
The intoxication was severe enough that the person entering into the contract was incapacitated.
-
The other party was aware of the intoxication at the time.
A voidable contract, in this instance, is one in which the intoxicated party can end the agreement under certain terms. To expand on the criteria above, in order for the intoxicated person to void the contract, there needs to be adequate proof that one of the following occurred:
-
The intoxicated person consumed enough alcohol or drugs to cause impairment in thinking sufficient enough that he could not understand the legal ramifications of entering into the contract.
-
The other party to the contract knew of the intoxication.
