Answer:
In reproductive privacy and freedom.
Explanation:
In this idea, mainly, the court further decided that the marriage couple had the right to take decisions about the contraception. Guaranteed the reproductive party and freedom. While Connecticut prohibited the birth control, until 1961, Estelle Griswold decided to open a birth control clinic in New Haven, causing the conflict. The supreme court guaranteed the Connecticut law was unconstitutional because it violated the Due Process Clause and The court further stated that the constitutional right to privacy guaranteed married couples the right to make their own decisions.
In terms of social influences, word-of-mouth has more credibility, but advertising has more <u>reach</u>.
<h3>What is advertising?</h3>
Advertising can be defined as the process of creating product or brand awareness so as to reach the target audience or to generate more sales.
Advertising can tend to reach large number of people especially if media is use for the advertisement, while on the other hand word of mouth has more credibility and reliable compare to advertising based on the fact that you word of mouth is a verbal communication from one person to another person.
Learn more about advertising here:brainly.com/question/1658517
#SPJ1
Answer:When I was, oh, <em>around</em> eight years old, I thought it would be fun to learn to play the piano. My parents agreed to purchase a piano. They told me that I would be required to practice one hour a day, <em>due to the fact that </em>piano lessons were expensive. At first, I practiced piano for two hours each day, <em>with the result that</em> I progressed very rapidly. Every day for two years I raced home <em>when </em>school was done and practiced the piano with great enthusiasm. Then one day, something happened. I decided I liked baseball better than the piano. Though I can play the piano rather well <em>at the present time</em>, I do not practice as long nor as diligently as I once did.
Explanation:
The class-action suit arises between the Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority alleged that public housing impacted government-sponsored segregation.
Option B is the correct answer.
<h3>What is a class action suit?</h3>
A class-action suit is a lawsuit filed by a particular person on behalf of the group of affected people against the accused party.
According to the provided case, the public housing was claimed by the government segregation which is being disputed in the class action suit. It provides dollars of money to the people of the US to acquire properties in residential areas.
Therefore, Government-sponsored segregation was alleged in the public housing under the class action suit in the provided case.
Learn more about the class action suit in the related link:
brainly.com/question/6330329
#SPJ1
