Answer:
If a CPA does an audit irresponsibly, the CPA will be held liable to third parties who were recognized and not foreseeable to the CPA for gross negligence.
It needs to be specified if the third party had been “anticipatable,” liability; it may be recognized for ordinary negligence within a Rosenblum v. Adler decision.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is d. $0.31 per client-visit; $24,766 per month.
Explanation:
The costs can be of fixed nature or a variable nature or of a mixed nature. A mixed costs contains a component of both fixed and variable costs. The high-low method is used to calculate the variable component per unit of a mixed cost. Th formula for high low method is:
Variable cost per unit = (Highest activity cost - Lowest activity cost) / (Highest activity level - Lowest activity level)
the highest activity is in June, 13400 client visits and the highest cost is also of this activity. The lowest activity is in August, 11207 client visits and the lowest cost belongs to this activity.
Variable cost per unit = (28920 - 28235) / (13400 - 11207)
Variable cost per unit = $0.31 rounded off to two decimal places
The fixed cost = Total cost - total variable cost
Taking 13400 activity,
The fixed component is = 28920 - (0.31 * 13400) = $24766 per month
Thus, the correct answer is d.
Answer:
Have defined value creation too narrowly in terms of financial performance thereby contributing to black swan events ( B )
Explanation:
Black swan events are events that come as a surprise to a company or individual with great / devastating effects and these events are usually due to inappropriate foresight to the problem.
A company that generates huge profits is not supposed to reduce the maintenance budget because ill maintained equipment will not result to efficient production and huge profits. the leaking of their pipelines and the significant environmental problem is an example of the Black swan event due to the trimming of maintenance budget by the Management.
C. Company cite :)
Please award me the best answer :)
Answer:
United Disposal, General Manufacturing Corporation, Ace Trucking Company, and/or Investment Properties.
Explanation:
When the EPA cleans up site, it generally uses money from its superfund and it is allowed to recover the money from the entity that caused the pollution (either directly or indirectly), the owner of the premise or the user of the premise. I.e. they can recover the funds from anyone involved. The EPA will try to recover the funds based on several aspects including the financial position of the entities involved. E.g. if United Disposal, Ace Trucking Company and General Manufacturing Company filed for bankruptcy, the EPA will recover the funds from Investiture Properties even if they were not responsible for the pollution.
