Caribbean islands, coast of Central America, and coast of South America
Anti-Federalists wanted the addition of political rights that would specify the powers of the government and police while protecting the freedom of speech and gun rights.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- In the beginning, the Bill of rights was opposed by the Anti-Federalist party and several arguments were raised.
- Arguments regarding the increase in no of slavery people and how this amendment resolves the issue in the society.
- Anti-Federalist believe that this act may deny their individuals from freedom and political rights.
- Bill of Rights explains the constitution with ten sets of principles.
- This amendment safeguards an individual's personal, public, security and political rights.
Answer:
Hindu
Explanation:
Hinduism is the oldest religion in India. In fact, some of the Hindu gods were most likely worshipped by the people of ancient Harappa. When the Aryans came into India, they brought their beliefs, and the stories of their gods in their holy book, the Rig Veda.
1.
the surroundings or conditions in which a person, animal, or plant lives or operates.
Environment can be defined as a sum total of all the living and non-living elements and their effects that influence human life.
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled in 1919 that Schenck violated the Espionage Act. His campaign included printing and mailing 15,000 fliers to draft-age men arguing that conscription (the draft) was unconstitutional and urging them to resist. According to Schenck, conscription is a form of "involuntary servitude" and is therefore prohibited by the 13th Amendment. People were told to exercise their rights to free speech, peaceful assembly, and petitioning the government. Charles Schenck was imprisoned for expressing his beliefs after the court upheld the Espionage Act as constitutional. Schenck requested a new trial after he was convicted of violating the Espionage Act in 1917. He was denied the request. Afterward, he appealed to the Supreme Court, which agreed to review his case in 1919. This case later showed certain kinds of speech would be deemed illegal if it posed as a threat to the US’s needs.
Explanation:
