The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "decreased over time and are primarily accepted by writ of certiorari" Petitions to the U.S. Supreme Court have <span>decreased over time and are primarily accepted by writ of certiorari</span>
The fire led to legislation requiring improved factory safety standards and helped spur the growth of the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union (ILGWU), which fought for better working conditions for sweatshop workers.
Date: March 25, 1911
Deaths: 146
Location: Asch Building, Manhattan, New York City, New York, U.S.
Non-fatal injuries: 78
Hey there!
The answer is A. That slavery was still allowed in a free nation.
One of the things the colonists fought for was freedom. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of the press along with other things.
However, for hundreds of thousands of slaves torn away from their homes, they had none of these freedoms. They were considered inferior and not people.
A paradox is a statement that seems absurd of self-contradictory, which this statement very much is. If the U.S. is a free nation, then why do hundreds of thousands of people living there have no freedoms, stolen from them by the very people who advocated for their own freedom?
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Caffè corretto (pronounced [kafˈfɛ kkorˈrɛtto]), an Italian beverage, consists of a shot of espresso with a small amount of liquor, usually grappa, and sometimes sambuca or brandy. It is also known (outside Italy) as an "espresso corretto".
Explanation:
so pretty much liquor :)
I don't think it would have a direct bearing on the outcome.....
