I believe it’s answer 2 :)
Institutionally,
imperialism regularly brought about the centralization of energy. At the point
when settlements wound up noticeably autonomous they regularly either had
establishments that had a tendency to unify control passed on from frontier
run, or social and financial structures that unified power in a little first
class that tended to oppose development toward democratization.
Socially,
previous provincial states had subjective fringes that made it hard to make a
bound together and lucid society. Intensifying the ethnic divisions created by
subjective outskirts was the way that amid frontier period, the gap and
overcome strategy was regularly utilized. This made an atmosphere of doubt
between ethnic gatherings that showed itself in ethnic clash in the autonomous
states.
A few
experts differ that imperialism can be reprimanded for the worldwide south's
underdevelopment today. Some battle that Africa was immature before Europeans
arrived, so the clarification for the present underdevelopment must be looked
for in culture, geology or history that pre-date imperialism. They additionally
take note of that a few nations that were never colonized or just quickly
colonized likewise encounter underdevelopment today.
Different
pundits call attention to that the genuine pilgrim structure was very little in
many states and that such a little framework of people couldn't have caused the
far reaching changes that are frequently credited to pioneer run the show.
Also, a few
commentators point to the way that expansionism bettered the general population
in the states in some courses by enhancing future, training and wellbeing
rehearses. Further, the way that some previous settlements have made some
significant monetary progress likewise indicates the way that imperialism was
not determinative of financial results today.
They combine their capital and receive permission from the government to merge
Answer:
A demagogue/irrational thought
Explanation:
The Founding Fathers feared that the country would be lead by a demagogue. A demagogue is a political leader who seeks support by appealing to the desires and prejudices of ordinary people rather than by using rational argument. They feared "tyranny of the minority".
The answer is C because theocracy is a form of government in which a god or deity is being reconized,and patriarchy<span> is a social system in which males hold primary power, predominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege and control of property</span>
