“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
Answer: Batesian mimicry
Explanation: Batesian Mimicry is defined as the resemblance of one or more non-poisonous species to a poisonous species. For example, the poisonous coral snake and the harmless milk snake. It is a relationship between two organisms where one is harmless, looks almost exactly like one that is harmful.
If you are competing for your party’s nomination for office, you must first participate in the statewide convention.
The groups that support a political party are collectively referred to as Interest groups. Interest groups are benefit seekers who come together to support a particular political party running for office. The group of people hopes to get benefits in case the political party they support gets into office.
Most candidates are elected to office during the general elections. Primary elections are usually to choose which person will be representing the party of which they are aligned with.
Footnote Parties aid in the election of politicians (by nominating and enlisting candidates, and then advising voters on whichever candidates to support), while in power, they organize and manage the government.
Learn more about party:
brainly.com/question/5610090
#SPJ4
Answer:
B. prices would do a better job of coordinating the activities of buyers and sellers than markets could.
Explanation:
In 1776, the Scottish economist and philosopher also known as the father of economics, suggested that price was better left to produce better market results than the intervention of guilds.
He was of the opinion that price control and regulations by guilds were disruptions to market play and would not be as efficient as allowing price be determined by the market(buyers and sellers). Adam was a pioneer of the free market economic theory.
Answer:
There Are Many
Explanation:
One main difference is the job description. A Clinical psychologists work to reduce psychological distress in people with mental or physical health problems. Clinical psychologists with substantial and appropriate experience may be called upon to act as expert witnesses and write legal reports or documents. These are who deal with the dirty work and take care of the known factors. A counseling psychologist is a more humanistic approach and personally discusses with the patient issues that are going on and how to potentially solve them. The are more on call and a crutch for people who need help.
