1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jeka94
3 years ago
15

If you were a king what would you do to bring a new change of development towards the people of your kingdom​

English
1 answer:
Blababa [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

If I were a monarch, I would assist the people of my kingdom with all of their needs and concerns. I'll treat them as if they were my own kin. In my kingdom, I will improve the educational system for both boys and girls. I'll convince my people that I'm their father, not their king.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
this part of the poem compares people to lyres, which are musical instruments. how does the poem describe the sound the strings
Naily [24]

The correct answer is The strings are always making new sounds.

The comparison in this poem between people and lyres shows many aspects of humanity and how fragile is our existence.

More importantly, it talks about how people can create, the sounds of the lyres are all the things people can do and how all of them can be totally different and interesting.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is Pakistan a powerful country?
LenaWriter [7]
Please file this under 'History' or 'Geography'.

It depends on one's perspective. A political leader from Pakistan may see it as the most triumphant. A homeless woman there may see that Pakistan failed her. An outsider may see it as less-than. It all depends.

Considering it is a Middle Eastern country with likely a lot of oil, it's already pretty powerful.

If you found this especially helpful, I'd appreciate if you'd vote me Brainliest for your answer, if other people did not provide a helpful answer (but, I'm sure they did!). I want to be able to assist more users one-on-one! :)
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5. How does power contribute to the central idea of the
Korvikt [17]

Answer:

Power contributes to the central idea of the text by allowing a group of people to censor something they consider 'wrong' using the authority they have.

Explanation:

For example, in Corporate Censorship, the company might forewarn their employees to not say anything negative about the business, or they could lose their jobs. They are using their power over the workers to makes sure they don't get put in a negative light.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
, what does the name Dee represent to the narrator?
melisa1 [442]
Prior to Dee leaving home, the everyday objects in her household were just that- everyday objects. She took no special notice of any of them. However, once she returns home, all of these objects represent great culture significance to her. She is incredibly enthused about how great the wooden benches and old quilts are because she thinks it is in-style to be in touch with her own culture.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Tolstoy uses a third person omniscient point of view in the novella The Death Of Ivan Ilyich. Most of chapter 1 is narrated from
Mars2501 [29]

The Death of Ivan Ilyich uses a third person omniscient narration, so the narrator is able to describe the thoughts, actions, and motives of multiple characters. If the first four chapters of the novella were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view, her judgment and perspective would have clouded the way we see the thoughts, actions, and motives of the other characters. For example, if the section about Ivan Ilyich's funeral had been told from her perspective, the narration might have been overly focused on her apparent grief. But readers, privy to her internal thoughts, would also realize that she didn’t care much about her husband, in life or in death. She might have centered the narration around Ivan Ilyich's suffering, how even she suffered because of Ivan Ilyich's illness, and how it was better now that he was gone. She would describe the ordeal she went through in the last few days before Ivan Ilyich's death. Given her apparent selfish character, she might well have made it seem like she suffered more than Ivan himself.  

The account of their marriage would also have been different if told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's perspective. She would probably portray Ivan Ilyich as a suitable match for herself. She might focus on the fact that he was a successful magistrate from a good family with good character and fine dancing skills. She would describe their courtship, how she fell in love with him, and their marriage in greater detail. She might tell us how she was really happy to be married to him, at least initially, and describe the first few months of her marriage as beautiful and happy. She’d likely describe how being a mother was hard and demanding, made more difficult by a husband who wasn't supportive. She would describe her outrage when Ivan starts to spend more time with friends, at parties, and at bridge games, apparently to avoid her.

Her perspective about Ivan Ilyich's illness would also be very different from what we actually read in chapter 4 of the novella. She'd probably complain about how Ivan was trying to get attention by fussing about some trivial health problem. She'd feel that his illness was his fault because he wouldn’t follow the doctor's instructions and would eat and drink all the wrong things, while she had to bear the consequences of his "illness."

Some details from the first four chapters would also be missing if the story were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view. For example, we wouldn’t have known of Ivan Ilyich's colleagues' thoughts about and reactions to his death. Praskovya wasn't part of this discussion, and she obviously couldn’t read their minds. She wouldn't have been able to write about Peter Ivanovich's fears and thoughts about death. The details of Ivan Ilyich's early life would also vary depending on her knowledge of Ivan Ilyich's family and his childhood. She wouldn't have been able to describe what Ivan was going through after their marriage and the birth of their children because he wasn't sharing his thoughts and feelings with her. And lastly, she was probably clueless about Ivan Ilyich's health concerns and his fear of death because they didn't talk much about it.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why does Major Kovaloff believe Madame Podtotchina is responsible for the disappearance of his nose?
    10·2 answers
  • Jupiter is the largest planet in our solar system. It is named for the ruler of the gods in Roman mythology. Which sentence comb
    15·2 answers
  • Here are the main points for an informative speech about the history of chocolate: I. Chocolate was orignally used in Mexico as
    7·1 answer
  • Which stage of the hero’s journey is represented in this passage?
    11·2 answers
  • Which word or phrase most clearly describes the genre of a document?
    7·1 answer
  • 2. What will happen to us if the surroundings<br>are not clean?<br><br>In my point of view_________​
    6·1 answer
  • The sentence that includes the central idea is
    6·1 answer
  • Every four seasons gives everything an effective ability to evolve, but why do people from young to old notice only one spring.?
    9·1 answer
  • Haven't i seen your face somewhere else?
    15·1 answer
  • What does the word brazen mean in the following line? "Not like the
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!