Answer:
I dont really know much about the economy but if I was you i'll go with B. Saudi Arabia's economy is dependent on oil sales.
Answer:
The inference that is best supported by the passage is: A. Prior to the "Click it or Ticket" law, motorist could not be stopped simply for not waring a seatbelt."
Explanation:
In the passage is very clear that in the new law motorist can be now pulled over and ticketed for not wearing seatbelts (later in the passage it implies that's the reason why lawyers and citizens' gorups are protesting), which implies that before the state legislature passed the law this was not a reason to be pulled over even though this is not stated in the passage, the entire text circles around the novelty of pulling over motorist for not wearing seatbelt, therefore the best option is A especially because that is the main idea of the text.
Answer:
displaying trustworthiness
Explanation:
The speech felt short of trustworthiness because the fact that the presentation well organized, it is false that the world is ending by 2020. This implies that the information from the speech is not correct and cannot be relied on. A good speech must contain factually correct information and can be relied on.
