Most, but not all, sociologists agree that it is unethical to misrepresent themselves.
In any type of investigation, it is important that the researcher identifies himself, the purpose of his investigations and requests the consent of the respondents. The sociologist and other researchers will question the idea of full disclosure during the investigation, citing changes in respondents. As sociologists study social patterns and relationships, it is expected that respondents in a sociological study will only present information that is considered socially acceptable, taking care of the political and cultural context of their points of view. For the sociologist, it is important to have a complete disclosure and to convince respondents to provide honest answers, that´s why its important to never misrepresent themselves, to be taken seriously.
<span>The reason that people usually will be bothered by the absence of conventions of talk is that in our communication lies cultural similarities and differences. When we follow conventions of talk, we are following our cultural norms and this provides a level of comfort for those involved. When these are not followed, there is an uneasiness that comes with the unfamiliarity, and necessary assumptions about the meaning of the communication can not be made.</span>
The correct answer to this question is letter "d." The statement that is not a similarity between communism and fascism is that fascism and communism both often include indoctrination, unquestionable obedience to the state, and state control of the economy.<span>
</span>
Mountain hills and deserts helped the Chinese to thrive mostly because it protected them from invasion quite well.
Ok good to know what the question do you want evidence to support go against or did you just want to share that factv
