Check the picture below.
keeping in mind that the point of tangency for a radius line and a tangent is alway a right-angle, since the "red" chord is parallel to the "green" tangent line outside, then the chord is cutting the "green" radius there in two equal halves at a right-angle, as you see in the picture.
we know the chord is 10 units long, so 5 + 5, since is perpendicularity with the radius will also cut the chord in two equal halves.
anyhow, all that said, we end up with triangle you see on the right-hand-side, and then we can just use the pythagorean theorem.

Answer:
JUST DOING THIS FOR POINTS
Step-by-step explanation:
LOL
V=lengthxwidthxheight
v=2 1/2x2 1/2x 5
=31.25
35-31.25=3.75
The answer is 3.75cm³
Answer:
1. t = 0.995 s
2. h = 15.92 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
First we have to look at the following formula
Vf = Vo + gt
then we work it to clear what we want
Vo + gt = Vf
gt = Vf - Vo
t = (Vf-Vo)/g
Now we have to complete the formula with the real data
Vo = 32 ft/s as the statement says
Vf = 0 because when it reaches its maximum point it will stop before starting to lower
g = -32,16 ft/s² it is a known constant, that we use it with the negative sign because it is in the opposite direction to ours
t = (0 ft/s - 32 ft/s) / -32,16 ft/s²
we solve and ...
t = 0.995 s
Now we will implement this result in the following formula to get the height at that time
h = (Vo - Vf) *t /2
h = (32 ft/s - 0 ft/s) * 0.995 s / 2
h = 32 ft/s * 0.995 s/2
h = 31.84 ft / 2
h = 15.92 ft
Answer:
B. (1,7)
Step-by-step explanation:
We can substitute the x and y values of each coordinate into the inequality and test if they work.
Let's start with A, 5 being y and 0 being x .

5 IS NOT greater than 5, they are the exact same, so A is out.
Let's try B, 1 being x and 7 being y.

7 IS greater than 6, so B. (1,7) does work for this inequality!
Let's do C for fun, when 7 is x and 1 is y.

1 IS NOT greater than 12, it is quite less than 12, so C doesn't work.
Therefore B. (1,7) works for the inequality of
.
Hope this helped!