Answer: Financial reforms were crucial to the New Deal and ending the Depression. The Securities Act of 1933 was passed to attempt to regulate Wall Street and lessen fraudulent activities with securities in the hopes of avoiding another stock market crash.
Explanation: Financial reforms were crucial to the New Deal and ending the Depression. The Securities Act of 1933 was passed to attempt to regulate Wall Street and lessen fraudulent activities with securities in the hopes of avoiding another stock market crash. The Banking Act of 1933, meanwhile, was further implementing banking regulations, this time invoking separation of investment banking and commercial banking and creating the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as part of the Glass-Steagall Act.
Answer: Depression, anxiety and substance-related disorder.
Explanation:
Many elderly people can develop substance use problems or mental disorders, such as depression and anxiety. The might suffer life stressors that are familiar to everyone, but they add up to stressors common to those in later life, like the meaningful continuous decline in their abilities. Moreover, aging people might endure different conditions at once.
A Joint Committee, is the answer
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
The correct answer is "to make laws" - answer D. You can see that it's connected to the laws because it's also the name of one of the three branches of the government (the legislative branch) which is responsible for making laws. (the other two : judicial: to judge and executive: to actually govern)
