Answer:
Correct answer is C. It made it clear that people living in U.S. territories had the same rights as people living in established states.
Explanation:
Option A is not correct as although slavery was prohibited in this Northwestern territories, that didn't meant that some new territories that were to enter United States had to prohibit slavery.
Option B is also not correct as states in these area were created a couple of years after the Ordinance was declared.
Option C is correct as the document stress out that all states would be equal in their rights.
Option D is not correct as the Ordinance has a bad effect on the Natives.
<span>Chief of Party. In this role, the president helps members of his or her political partyget elected or appointed to office. The president campaigns for those members who have supported his or her policies. At the end of a term, the president may campaign for reelection.</span>
Answer: I think the answer is D...... He himself was a wealthy prince and left everything to become a monk and live a peaceful life.
Explanation:
Thomas Jefferson questioned his right to buy the Louisiana Territory as the United States Constitution did not directly address the acquisition of land by the President.
The Federalists were clamoring that the Louisiana Purchase was unconstitutional but the Democratic Republicans believed it was permissible as it was merely a treaty.
The answer is B
Basically, Europe (Britain, Germany, Russia, France, etc.) was trying to divide up China among itself. America (since they now had the Philippines and could trade more in Asia) wanted to make sure they weren't locked out of trading with China. So the US kinda stepped into the discussion and said "I think that no matter what happens, let's not stop anyone from trading here. So even if Russia or Britain hates us at some point, that doesn't stop us from doing what we need to do."
What's funny is most of Europe went along with it. (except Russia because Russia don't care).