Answer:D- James Lange theory
Explanation:
James Lange theory states that for an individual to experience any form of emotion he/she must experience some reactions from the body such as increased pulse and sweats in certain parts of the body .
Napoleon invaded Spain in 1808 under the excuse on the pretext of sending reinforcements to the French-Spanish army in the occupation of Portugal.
Napoleon began sending troops to Spain, where the population greeted them enthusiastically, despite a sharp rise in tensions in diplomatic relations. In February 1808, this silent invasion grew into open action: Napoleon showed his intentions and ordered the French generals to stop the march and occupy the Spanish fortresses. Pamplona fell first, and very soon Barcelona, when a French convoy, disguised as a convoy with the wounded, persuaded the authorities to open the city gates.
Explanation:
- Meanwhile, at the insistence of the aristocratic party, the Spanish government forced Charles IV to abdicate in favor of his son, Fernando.
- Napoleon took the royal family to Bayonne and on May 5 forced them both to abdicate in favor of his brother, Joseph Bonaparte.
- The puppet government approved the new king, and then Joseph tried to establish himself on the Spanish throne but provoked a popular uprising that spread throughout the country.
Class: Social studies
Level: Middle school
Keywords: Napoleon, invasion on Spain, Joseph Bonaparte
Learn more on Napoleon on
brainly.com/question/2895638
brainly.com/question/277050
brainly.com/question/1305707
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
D. Convincing France to send 6,000 soldiers
Explanation:
Pennsylvania was the first to vote, new york had the most.
Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
