Her style was characterized by usage of hyphens and weird sentencing so here is my attempt.
Explanation:
Once or twice it happened --
but all the while - i left the blame
to let the blame scorch the sky
and never, ever ----- reach
reach for me, because ---- no one could.
Attempting futility --- again
I rise, I fall, yes-- indeed again
Reach for me, because it seems
It's not possible
To reach, no one could.
<u>This poem attempts at her disjointed punctuation along with the free verse stanzas with augmented flows that seem to be found often in her poetry</u>. Hope this helps.
Hello. Unfortunately, it is not possible to have access to the video "The Day I Saved a Life" and the unit to which you refer in the question above, which makes it impossible for this question to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
According to the titles presented in the question, we can infer that the relationship between the two works is the fact that, many times, we are at risk, due to our survival instinct. Often, for it to be necessary to get rid of something that is threatening us, we need to face some risks and face some difficulties that, although dangerous, can save us. This occurs even when we see someone in danger, as our sense of survival is very strong and comprehensive.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Jury pools are drafted from voter registration lists, so if you're not legible to vote you cannot be drafted to serve on a jury.
Answer:
Explanation:
Every choice that we had decided on doing can impact our lives either in a good or in a bad way, it helps shapes us to identify who we are to ourselves and to other people. Think long term, don’t just think about what’s good right now, and instead make a choice that can also be important to you in the future. Thinking short term is the opposite of the long term thinking. Instead of considering the possible impacts of a course of action over the long term, we think about what might happen today, tomorrow or next week.
