1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
neonofarm [45]
3 years ago
5

Short Answer: EXPLAIN why it would or would not be a good idea for the U.S.A to be governed by a dynasty.

History
1 answer:
Alinara [238K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

One pro would be 'Support for future generations'. This meaning that Dynasty's can be used to leave a legacy support for multiple generations to come. Any family member (wives, sons, aunts, ect..)  in government position have enough knowledge on politics, they know how to care and deal with the people. (So for example, we know if a ruler were to die the kingdom would be passed on to the eldest child)

Hope this helped!

You might be interested in
What was one effect on these events
slava [35]
I believe that the first choice is the correct one
4 0
3 years ago
What was life like for peasants under the Tokugawa Shogunate?
horsena [70]

The life of peasants under the Tokugawa Shogunate was they paid high taxes and mainly lived in poverty.

Answer: Option A

<u>Explanation:</u>

The main job of the peasants in the Tokugawa Shogunate was to grow crops and do farming. These peasants barely owned the land on which they could only live or some of them did not even own land and they had to rent it from the land lords and had to work as tenant farmers. They also had to pay rent, sometimes in the form of rice, and all these situations led to them living in poverty.

3 0
3 years ago
The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 was justified by the belief that:​
bonufazy [111]

Answer:

Immigrants had no loyalty to the United States is the correct answer.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What changes when apply becomes applies
OleMash [197]
Y to ies , makes it plural
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following represents a difference between the government of the Roman Republic and that of Imperial Rome? (4 points
jeka57 [31]

<em><u>Answer:</u></em>

b) In the Roman Republic, the Senate represented the patricians' views, while in the Imperial Rome, the Senate represented the emperor's views.

<em><u>Explanation:</u></em>

Under the early Roman government the Senate created an advisory committee; in 509 BC it contained 300 individuals, and a refinement existed inside it between the leaders of the more noteworthy and of the lesser families. All through the monarchical period, the Senate comprised completely of patricians, and its forces as of now were inconclusive.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Put the following events in chronological order by numbering them 1-6, one being first and six being the last event to take plac
    8·1 answer
  • In China, the development of civil service examinations and a belief in filial piety reflect the influence of
    10·1 answer
  • NEED DONE ASAP!!!!!!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • The painful process of doing without drugs after having been addicted is called:
    14·2 answers
  • HELP ASAP!! MARKING BRAINLIEST!!! WORTH 10 POINTS FIRST PERSON TO ANSER CORRECTLY GETS BRAINLIEST!!!!
    11·2 answers
  • Did Joseph Brant make the right decision or the wrong decision for his people? 3 paragraph essay :/
    9·1 answer
  • By 1830, American settlers in Texas had displeased Mexican authorities by
    11·1 answer
  • I need the answers for my worksheet called mesoamerica geography​
    12·2 answers
  • HELP
    5·2 answers
  • Which court would next hear the case in this scenario?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!