The acquittal of Mr. Kyle Rittenhouse, who killed two men and wounded another in a <em>riot against the killing</em> of Jacob Blake, who was protesting the police brutality against George Floyd, can only be seen as a symbol of America's racial divide.
The question is, was Mr. Rittenhouse right to carry a gun at 17 years when he was attending to keep the peace and provide medical aid to protesters? At his age then, was Mr. Rittenhouse authorized to belong to a Vigilante Group that could keep the peace in racial protests?
Thus, given Mr. Rittenhouse's age and the purpose of his presence at the scene of rioting, the verdict that acquitted him is bound to attract controversy concerning broader issues of <em>vigilantism, gun rights,</em><em> and proper definition of </em><em>self-defense</em>.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/25716779
Answer:
One of the often forgotten objectives of the criminal justice system, rehabilitation aims to transform the offender into becoming a valuable member of the general population once he serves his time in prison. Here, they are taught skills that will render them useful in general society. There is evidence that rehabilitation (including within prison) reduces crime and can be cost-effective.
(please give brainliest)
I will be turning 14 in 2022
You watch the video and go to where you see your notifications and skip the video!
