Answer:
Becky, because her justification for the second statement should be "definition of supplementary angles" rather than "angle addition postulate."
Step-by-step explanation:
Becky completed the proof incorrectly because her justification for the second statement is not totally correct.
Angle addition postulate does not really apply here, as the sum of 2 angles may not give you exactly 180°.
However, the second statement, m<AKG + m<GKB = 180° and m<GKB + m<HKB = 180°, can be justified by the "Definition of Supplementary Angles".
The sum of supplementary angles = 180°.
Therefore, Becky completed the proof incorrectly.
F(2)= 4(16) - 6(4) + 8(2) - 15
F(2)= 64 -24 + 16 - 15
F(2)= 41
G= -36
If you need a step by step please message me
Assume that 3 digits are selected at random from the set {1,3,5,6,7,8} { 1 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 } and are arranged in random orde
Mumz [18]
Sample space is 36.so the probability must be 20/36.from three digits the maximum no.of number can be made is 6.
